An international qualitative feasibility study to explore the process of using social innovation (co-production) strategies with older people: the SAIL project

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Holly Crossen-White, A. Hemingway, A. Ladkin, Andrew Jones, Amanda Burke, O. Timmermans
{"title":"An international qualitative feasibility study to explore the process of using social innovation (co-production) strategies with older people: the SAIL project","authors":"Holly Crossen-White, A. Hemingway, A. Ladkin, Andrew Jones, Amanda Burke, O. Timmermans","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-02-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to present the feasibility study findings from a four-year project funded by the European Union Commission (the SAIL project, Staying Active and Independent for Longer). The funding stream was Interreg 2Seas which offers opportunities for coastal areas on both sides of the English Channel to work together on complex practical issues. The project focused on enabling older people to stay active and independent for longer using social innovation (co-production) approaches.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTen pilot projects were developed, and each of the pilots worked with an academic partner to undertake a feasibility study that included 10 pilots across the four countries involved, France, Belgium, Holland and England.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper presents barriers and facilitators (using logic models) to the social innovation process with older people, which has wider relevance in terms of social innovation and its application.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings which inform this paper are extensive, and this is a longitudinal qualitative study with much of the data collection being done using an online wiki (complemented by interviews and documentary analysis) which is a relatively new method for data collection. However, the consistency of the findings when analysed by three researchers was clear and pragmatically this complex method was required to examine complexity in the process of implementing social innovation in practice.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis project has enabled greater understanding of how social innovation can be applied and has highlighted contextual issues that can undermine or enable attempts to adopt the approach.\n\n\nSocial implications\nFor the 10 pilot projects generated, there were obviously important cultural and geographical differences in terms of engagement and practical implementation of social innovation. Some of which, as mentioned in this paper, are very important for the successful implementation of social innovation in a particular setting and indeed may be a strength or a barrier in terms of engaging with local people and agencies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe development of logic models is a useful approach when the topic under study is complex and likely to produce a diverse set of process outcomes. The logic model focuses upon the relationships between the resources that are used to create the intervention and what is produced in terms of outcomes. Ultimately, this enables the identification of the factors that contribute to a successful intervention. Thus, in relation to this study, logic models have helped to provide an evidence-based framework that can support decision-making regarding the most effective use of limited resources to support successful social innovation processes in the future. The logic model for each area of the findings presented here can in the future be used to help implement social innovation; also, to consider how it can be improved in future research.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-02-2022-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present the feasibility study findings from a four-year project funded by the European Union Commission (the SAIL project, Staying Active and Independent for Longer). The funding stream was Interreg 2Seas which offers opportunities for coastal areas on both sides of the English Channel to work together on complex practical issues. The project focused on enabling older people to stay active and independent for longer using social innovation (co-production) approaches. Design/methodology/approach Ten pilot projects were developed, and each of the pilots worked with an academic partner to undertake a feasibility study that included 10 pilots across the four countries involved, France, Belgium, Holland and England. Findings This paper presents barriers and facilitators (using logic models) to the social innovation process with older people, which has wider relevance in terms of social innovation and its application. Research limitations/implications The findings which inform this paper are extensive, and this is a longitudinal qualitative study with much of the data collection being done using an online wiki (complemented by interviews and documentary analysis) which is a relatively new method for data collection. However, the consistency of the findings when analysed by three researchers was clear and pragmatically this complex method was required to examine complexity in the process of implementing social innovation in practice. Practical implications This project has enabled greater understanding of how social innovation can be applied and has highlighted contextual issues that can undermine or enable attempts to adopt the approach. Social implications For the 10 pilot projects generated, there were obviously important cultural and geographical differences in terms of engagement and practical implementation of social innovation. Some of which, as mentioned in this paper, are very important for the successful implementation of social innovation in a particular setting and indeed may be a strength or a barrier in terms of engaging with local people and agencies. Originality/value The development of logic models is a useful approach when the topic under study is complex and likely to produce a diverse set of process outcomes. The logic model focuses upon the relationships between the resources that are used to create the intervention and what is produced in terms of outcomes. Ultimately, this enables the identification of the factors that contribute to a successful intervention. Thus, in relation to this study, logic models have helped to provide an evidence-based framework that can support decision-making regarding the most effective use of limited resources to support successful social innovation processes in the future. The logic model for each area of the findings presented here can in the future be used to help implement social innovation; also, to consider how it can be improved in future research.
一项探讨与老年人一起使用社会创新(合作生产)战略过程的国际定性可行性研究:SAIL项目
目的本文旨在介绍欧盟委员会资助的一个为期四年的项目(SAIL项目,“保持活跃和独立更长时间”)的可行性研究结果。资金流是Interreg 2Seas,它为英吉利海峡两岸的沿海地区提供了在复杂的实际问题上合作的机会。该项目的重点是利用社会创新(合作生产)方法使老年人能够更长时间地保持活跃和独立。设计/方法/方法制定了十个试点项目,每个试点项目都与一位学术合作伙伴合作进行了一项可行性研究,其中包括法国、比利时、荷兰和英国四个国家的10个试点项目,这在社会创新及其应用方面具有更广泛的相关性。研究局限性/含义本文的研究结果是广泛的,这是一项纵向定性研究,大部分数据收集都是使用在线维基(辅以访谈和文献分析)进行的,而这是一种相对较新的数据收集方法。然而,当三名研究人员进行分析时,发现的一致性是明确和务实的,需要这种复杂的方法来检验实践中实施社会创新过程的复杂性。实际含义该项目使人们能够更好地理解如何应用社会创新,并强调了可能破坏或促成采用该方法的尝试的背景问题。社会影响在产生的10个试点项目中,在参与和实际实施社会创新方面存在明显的重要文化和地理差异。如本文所述,其中一些对于在特定环境中成功实施社会创新非常重要,实际上可能是与当地人民和机构接触的优势或障碍。独创性/价值当研究的主题很复杂并且可能产生一组不同的过程结果时,逻辑模型的开发是一种有用的方法。逻辑模型侧重于用于创建干预的资源与结果之间的关系。最终,这能够确定有助于成功干预的因素。因此,就这项研究而言,逻辑模型有助于提供一个基于证据的框架,该框架可以支持关于最有效地利用有限资源支持未来成功的社会创新进程的决策。这里提出的研究结果的每个领域的逻辑模型将来都可以用来帮助实施社会创新;此外,考虑如何在未来的研究中加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信