Schermo, habitat, piattaforma. Metafore dell'immaginario della comunicazione = Screen, habitat, platform. Metaphors of the imaginary of communication

IF 0.2 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Giovanni Ciofalo, Silvia Leonzi
{"title":"Schermo, habitat, piattaforma. Metafore dell'immaginario della comunicazione = Screen, habitat, platform. Metaphors of the imaginary of communication","authors":"Giovanni Ciofalo, Silvia Leonzi","doi":"10.1285/I22840753N19P7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last forty years, by incarnating the very essence of an increasingly widespread and pervasive symbolic power, communication has acquired an unprecedented centrality. Additionally, over the same period there has been an exponential multiplication of interpretations, readings, studies and research that have affected public and academic debate. Dystopias and fears, fuelled by the historical-political events of the first half of the 20th century and then reinforced in the 1970s by the hypothetical return to powerful media, were first flanked and then hybridised by new conceptions and utopian visions, sometimes simplistic and even populist. This certainly represents a more articulated and complex Weltanschauung, capable of uncovering an evolved imaginary, rich in contradictions due to the many roles and multiple values and functions (even vicarious) acquired by communication itself. In the light of the above premises, this paper aims to suggest a reflection regarding the way some interpretative categories and key concepts of communication, capable of crystallising its specific aspects, have contributed over the last few decades to re-construct its current imaginary. In particular, we seek to analyse the dynamic figuration in which images, meanings and metaphors are stratified and confused, referable to the impact of media on everyday life, to the flourishing of cultural industries, to the gradual domestication of technologies, to the surfacing of a connective and collective intelligence and to a proper utopia of communication. Such imaginary has been marked, in more recent years, by the affirmation of a convergence that also comes to be cultural, as well as by new collective obsessions, by forms of control, homologation, and surveillance.","PeriodicalId":40441,"journal":{"name":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","volume":"2021 1","pages":"7-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I22840753N19P7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last forty years, by incarnating the very essence of an increasingly widespread and pervasive symbolic power, communication has acquired an unprecedented centrality. Additionally, over the same period there has been an exponential multiplication of interpretations, readings, studies and research that have affected public and academic debate. Dystopias and fears, fuelled by the historical-political events of the first half of the 20th century and then reinforced in the 1970s by the hypothetical return to powerful media, were first flanked and then hybridised by new conceptions and utopian visions, sometimes simplistic and even populist. This certainly represents a more articulated and complex Weltanschauung, capable of uncovering an evolved imaginary, rich in contradictions due to the many roles and multiple values and functions (even vicarious) acquired by communication itself. In the light of the above premises, this paper aims to suggest a reflection regarding the way some interpretative categories and key concepts of communication, capable of crystallising its specific aspects, have contributed over the last few decades to re-construct its current imaginary. In particular, we seek to analyse the dynamic figuration in which images, meanings and metaphors are stratified and confused, referable to the impact of media on everyday life, to the flourishing of cultural industries, to the gradual domestication of technologies, to the surfacing of a connective and collective intelligence and to a proper utopia of communication. Such imaginary has been marked, in more recent years, by the affirmation of a convergence that also comes to be cultural, as well as by new collective obsessions, by forms of control, homologation, and surveillance.
屏幕,栖息地,平台。沟通想象的隐喻=屏幕、栖息地、平台。交际想象的隐喻
在过去的四十年里,通过体现日益广泛和普遍的象征力量的本质,传播获得了前所未有的中心地位。此外,在同一时期,影响公众和学术辩论的解释、阅读、研究和研究呈指数级增长。20世纪上半叶的历史政治事件助长了反乌托邦和恐惧,然后在20世纪70年代又因假设回归强大的媒体而加剧,这些反乌托邦和担忧首先被新的概念和乌托邦愿景所左右,然后被混合在一起,有时是简单化的,甚至是民粹主义的。这当然代表了一个更清晰、更复杂的世界观,能够揭示一个进化的想象,由于沟通本身所获得的许多角色和多重价值观和功能(甚至是替代性的)而充满矛盾。鉴于上述前提,本文旨在反思在过去几十年中,能够具体化其具体方面的传播的一些解释类别和关键概念对重新构建其当前想象的贡献。特别是,我们试图分析图像、意义和隐喻被分层和混淆的动态形象,这与媒体对日常生活的影响、文化产业的繁荣、技术的逐渐本土化、连接和集体智慧的出现以及适当的沟通乌托邦有关。近年来,这种想象的标志是对文化融合的肯定,以及新的集体痴迷,控制、认同和监督的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信