A Stethoscope to the World: The Fault Lines Between Marxism and Afropessimism

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
J. Fermin
{"title":"A Stethoscope to the World: The Fault Lines Between Marxism and Afropessimism","authors":"J. Fermin","doi":"10.1017/s0147547922000254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Capital, Karl Marx provides an immanent critique of capitalism. The text offers a rendering of a political economy that is at times “synchronic” as it describes how capital works irrespective of any given moment in history, but also “diachronic” when it accounts for the historical development of capitalism as Marx knew it. These affordances equip Marx with a language essential to characterizing an “antagonism” between the worker and the capitalist. This antagonism subtends capitalism's demise since the proletariat possesses the numbers to overthrow the bourgeoisie. However, Marxism's assumptive logic only holds water when considering the structural position of the worker. The structural position of the slave entails no such denouement. In his 1983 book Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition, Cedric Robinson notes that “slave labor” helped scaffold “what Marx termed ‘primitive accumulation,’ [but] it would be an error to arrest the relationship there, assigning slave labor to some ‘pre-capitalist’ stage of history . . . this meant that the interpretation of history in terms of the dialectic of capitalist class struggles would prove inadequate”—inadequate, that is, to the task of understanding forms of racial alienation, exploitation, and suffering that lose visibility in class-reductionist discourses.1 In a critical divergence from Robinson's Black radical tradition, Frank Wilderson's contributions to the framework of Afropessimism pose a different yet nonetheless crucial intervention to Marxism. Importantly, Robinson throws into relief the concomitance of slavery and racialization with the logic of capitalism, proclaiming that “the Atlantic slave trade and the slavery of the New World were integral to the modern world economy. Their relationship to capitalism was historical and organic rather than adventitious or synthetic.”2 Wilderson argues, however, that the concomitance of slavery and racialization (particularly for Blackness) circumscribes capitalism on the level of paradigm.","PeriodicalId":14353,"journal":{"name":"International Labor and Working-Class History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labor and Working-Class History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0147547922000254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Capital, Karl Marx provides an immanent critique of capitalism. The text offers a rendering of a political economy that is at times “synchronic” as it describes how capital works irrespective of any given moment in history, but also “diachronic” when it accounts for the historical development of capitalism as Marx knew it. These affordances equip Marx with a language essential to characterizing an “antagonism” between the worker and the capitalist. This antagonism subtends capitalism's demise since the proletariat possesses the numbers to overthrow the bourgeoisie. However, Marxism's assumptive logic only holds water when considering the structural position of the worker. The structural position of the slave entails no such denouement. In his 1983 book Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition, Cedric Robinson notes that “slave labor” helped scaffold “what Marx termed ‘primitive accumulation,’ [but] it would be an error to arrest the relationship there, assigning slave labor to some ‘pre-capitalist’ stage of history . . . this meant that the interpretation of history in terms of the dialectic of capitalist class struggles would prove inadequate”—inadequate, that is, to the task of understanding forms of racial alienation, exploitation, and suffering that lose visibility in class-reductionist discourses.1 In a critical divergence from Robinson's Black radical tradition, Frank Wilderson's contributions to the framework of Afropessimism pose a different yet nonetheless crucial intervention to Marxism. Importantly, Robinson throws into relief the concomitance of slavery and racialization with the logic of capitalism, proclaiming that “the Atlantic slave trade and the slavery of the New World were integral to the modern world economy. Their relationship to capitalism was historical and organic rather than adventitious or synthetic.”2 Wilderson argues, however, that the concomitance of slavery and racialization (particularly for Blackness) circumscribes capitalism on the level of paradigm.
世界的听诊器:马克思主义与非洲主义的断层线
在《资本论》中,卡尔·马克思对资本主义进行了内在的批判。该书提供了一种政治经济学的描述,它有时是“共时性的”,因为它描述了资本如何在历史上的任何特定时刻运作,但当它解释马克思所知道的资本主义的历史发展时,它也是“历时性的”。这些启示使马克思具备了描述工人和资本家之间“对抗”的必要语言。由于无产阶级拥有推翻资产阶级的人数,这种对立就会导致资本主义的灭亡。然而,马克思主义的假设逻辑只有在考虑工人的结构性地位时才站得住脚。奴隶的结构地位不需要这样的结局。在1983年出版的《黑人马克思主义:黑人激进传统的形成》一书中,塞德里克·罗宾逊(Cedric Robinson)指出,“奴隶劳动”帮助支撑了“马克思所说的‘原始积累’,(但)将这种关系局限于此,将奴隶劳动归于‘前资本主义’的历史阶段是错误的……”这意味着,根据资本主义阶级斗争的辩证法来解释历史将被证明是不充分的”——也就是说,对于理解在阶级还原主义话语中失去可见性的种族异化、剥削和痛苦的形式的任务是不充分的与罗宾逊的黑人激进传统截然不同的是,弗兰克·怀尔德森对非洲悲观主义框架的贡献对马克思主义提出了一种不同但至关重要的干预。重要的是,鲁滨逊将奴隶制和种族化与资本主义的逻辑联系在一起,宣称“大西洋奴隶贸易和新大陆的奴隶制是现代世界经济不可或缺的一部分”。他们与资本主义的关系是历史性的、有机的,而不是偶然的或合成的。然而,怀尔德森认为,奴隶制和种族化(尤其是黑人)的共存在范式层面上限制了资本主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ILWCH has an international reputation for scholarly innovation and quality. It explores diverse topics from globalisation and workers’ rights to class and consumption, labour movements, class identities and cultures, unions, and working-class politics. ILWCH publishes original research, review essays, conference reports from around the world, and an acclaimed scholarly controversy section. Comparative and cross-disciplinary, the journal is of interest to scholars in history, sociology, political science, labor studies, global studies, and a wide range of other fields and disciplines. Published for International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信