Perioperative Complications Following One-Stage Bilateral and Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach

John Attenello, Maria I Opanova, Anne R. Wright, M. Saruwatari, Kelvin Naito, Sean Chan, Sean Saito, Samantha N. Andrews, Cass K. Nakasone
{"title":"Perioperative Complications Following One-Stage Bilateral and Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach","authors":"John Attenello, Maria I Opanova, Anne R. Wright, M. Saruwatari, Kelvin Naito, Sean Chan, Sean Saito, Samantha N. Andrews, Cass K. Nakasone","doi":"10.15438/RR.8.2.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A single stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty utilizing the direct anterior approach has been reported to have a similar incidence of perioperative complications as unilateral total hip arthroplasty.  However, previous studies have included various surgeons with differences in contraindications, protocol, technique and/or experience. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare perioperative outcomes in single-stage bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasties via the direct anterior approach performed by a single, fellowship trained, high volume arthroplasty surgeon. Methods A retrospective review was completed on consecutive single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2009 and 2017 and compared to consecutive unilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2014 and 2016.  Perioperative data and complications occurring within 90 days were collected for all included patients.  Student t-tests were performed to detect differences between bilateral and unilateral surgical variables. Results A total of 349 patients (531 hips) were included, consisting of 182 BTHA patients (364 hips) and 167 unilateral THA patients. Patients undergoing unilateral THA had significantly lower operating time, shorter length of stay, lower estimated blood loss, lower rate of transfusions and higher rate of home discharge compared to BTHA (p<0.001). Complications were present in four unilateral THA patients, three requiring revision, and nine BTHA patients, three requiring revision. Conclusions There was no difference in complications, as well as no perioperative mortalities or systemic complications, within 90 days following surgery between unilateral and bilateral patients.  Based on these results, single-stage DAA BTHA is a safe procedure to perform, and did not appear to result in higher rates of complications when compared to patients receiving a DAA unilateral THA.","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.8.2.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background A single stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty utilizing the direct anterior approach has been reported to have a similar incidence of perioperative complications as unilateral total hip arthroplasty.  However, previous studies have included various surgeons with differences in contraindications, protocol, technique and/or experience. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare perioperative outcomes in single-stage bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasties via the direct anterior approach performed by a single, fellowship trained, high volume arthroplasty surgeon. Methods A retrospective review was completed on consecutive single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2009 and 2017 and compared to consecutive unilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2014 and 2016.  Perioperative data and complications occurring within 90 days were collected for all included patients.  Student t-tests were performed to detect differences between bilateral and unilateral surgical variables. Results A total of 349 patients (531 hips) were included, consisting of 182 BTHA patients (364 hips) and 167 unilateral THA patients. Patients undergoing unilateral THA had significantly lower operating time, shorter length of stay, lower estimated blood loss, lower rate of transfusions and higher rate of home discharge compared to BTHA (p<0.001). Complications were present in four unilateral THA patients, three requiring revision, and nine BTHA patients, three requiring revision. Conclusions There was no difference in complications, as well as no perioperative mortalities or systemic complications, within 90 days following surgery between unilateral and bilateral patients.  Based on these results, single-stage DAA BTHA is a safe procedure to perform, and did not appear to result in higher rates of complications when compared to patients receiving a DAA unilateral THA.
直接前路一期双侧和单侧全髋关节置换术后围手术期并发症
背景:据报道,单期双侧全髋关节置换术采用直接前路与单侧全髋关节置换术的围手术期并发症发生率相似。然而,先前的研究包括了不同的外科医生,他们在禁忌症、方案、技术和/或经验上存在差异。问题/目的:本回顾性研究的目的是比较单期双侧和单侧全髋关节置换术的围手术期结果,由一名单独的、接受过协会培训的大容量髋关节置换术医生进行直接前路手术。方法回顾性分析2009年至2017年进行的连续单期双侧全髋关节置换术,并与2014年至2016年进行的连续单侧全髋关节置换术进行比较。收集所有入选患者围手术期资料及90天内发生的并发症。采用学生t检验来检测双侧和单侧手术变量之间的差异。结果共纳入349例患者(531髋),其中BTHA 182例(364髋),单侧THA 167例。与BTHA相比,单侧THA患者手术时间更短,住院时间更短,估计失血量更低,输血率更低,出院率更高(p<0.001)。4例单侧THA患者出现并发症,3例需要翻修,9例BTHA患者出现并发症,3例需要翻修。结论单侧与双侧患者术后90天内并发症发生率、围手术期死亡率及全身性并发症均无差异。基于这些结果,单期DAA全髋关节置换术是一种安全的手术,与接受DAA单侧全髋关节置换术的患者相比,没有出现更高的并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信