От психологического комизма к механическому комизму: Разговор на большой дороге И. С. Тургенева и Женский вопрос Надежды Тэффи

IF 0.3 3区文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC

RUSSIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ruslit.2021.11.006

Херта Шмид (Herta Schmid)

{"title":"От психологического комизма к механическому комизму: Разговор на большой дороге И. С. Тургенева и Женский вопрос Надежды Тэффи","authors":"Херта Шмид (Herta Schmid)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2021.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Research has characterized Nadezhda Teffi as the female Chekhov. (See Stelleman 2019.) However, connections can also be found between her work and that of Ivan S. Turgenev. In particular the one-act plays Разговор на большой дороге (Conversation on a Highroad; 1851) and Женский вопрос (The Woman Question; 1907) are suitable for comparison. Not only does my comparison consider the gender conflict between man and woman, but also a dialectic method which Teffi may have discovered in Turgenev’s work and elaborated further. The dialectical considerations are connected with different comic approaches: the psychological comedy of the realist Turgenev in the middle of the 19th century and the mechanical comedy of the utopian Teffi at the start of the 20th century. Its mechanical comicality shows that Женский вопрос relates to an international debate, in which Paul Julius Möbius’ essay ‘Über den physiologischen Schwachsinn des Weibes’ (‘On the Physiological Idiocy of the Female’; 1900) may well have played an unfavourable role.</div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347921000727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has characterized Nadezhda Teffi as the female Chekhov. (See Stelleman 2019.) However, connections can also be found between her work and that of Ivan S. Turgenev. In particular the one-act plays Разговор на большой дороге (Conversation on a Highroad; 1851) and Женский вопрос (The Woman Question; 1907) are suitable for comparison. Not only does my comparison consider the gender conflict between man and woman, but also a dialectic method which Teffi may have discovered in Turgenev’s work and elaborated further. The dialectical considerations are connected with different comic approaches: the psychological comedy of the realist Turgenev in the middle of the 19th century and the mechanical comedy of the utopian Teffi at the start of the 20th century. Its mechanical comicality shows that Женский вопрос relates to an international debate, in which Paul Julius Möbius’ essay ‘Über den physiologischen Schwachsinn des Weibes’ (‘On the Physiological Idiocy of the Female’; 1900) may well have played an unfavourable role.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从心理喜剧到机械喜剧：大马路上的谈话。C.国际合作屠格涅夫和妇女问题的希望塔菲

研究将娜杰日达·特菲描述为女性版的契诃夫。(参见斯特勒曼2019。)然而，在她的作品和屠格涅夫的作品之间也可以找到联系。特别是独幕剧Разговор на большой дороге(公路上的对话;1851年)和Женский вопрос(妇女问题;1907年)都适合作比较。我的比较不仅考虑了男女之间的性别冲突，也是特菲可能在屠格涅夫的作品中发现并进一步阐述的一种辩证法方法。辩证的思考与不同的喜剧方式相联系:19世纪中叶现实主义作家屠格涅夫的心理喜剧和20世纪初乌托邦作家特菲的机械喜剧。它的机械滑稽性表明Женский вопрос与一场国际辩论有关，其中保罗·朱利叶斯Möbius“论文”Über den physiologischen Schwachsinn des webes(“论女性的生理白痴”);(1900)很可能起了不利的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.