Interactions between ecosystem properties and land use clarify spatial strategies to optimize trade-offs between agriculture and species conservation

M. Cebrián‐Piqueras, J. Trinogga, Celia Grande, V. Minden, M. Maier, M. Kleyer
{"title":"Interactions between ecosystem properties and land use clarify spatial strategies to optimize trade-offs between agriculture and species conservation","authors":"M. Cebrián‐Piqueras, J. Trinogga, Celia Grande, V. Minden, M. Maier, M. Kleyer","doi":"10.1080/21513732.2017.1289245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Species conservation and forage production are both important, yet conflicting components of sustainable grassland management. We modeled forage production and conservation value as dependents in a chain of responses and effects, starting with abiotic environmental conditions that affect the spatial distribution of land uses and biotic ecosystem properties. We asked which relationships in this causal chain determine trade-offs between forage production and conservation value. Abiotic and biotic ecosystem properties were recorded on 46 plots in the coastal marshes of Northwest Germany. Plant and bird conservation values were calculated using Red Lists, and sales of forage-based agricultural products were assessed by interviewing farmers. We used a structural equation model to determine responses and effects. Groundwater depth and salinity represent the ultimate causes for the spatial variation in sales and conservation value. The water gradient translated into more proximate causes, such as land-use intensity affecting aboveground net primary productivity, forage quality, and species richness. Plant species conservation and forage production were segregated along the water gradient, and both bird conservation and forage production depended on grassland management, albeit at different fertilization levels. Our study points to segregation and integration as two spatial strategies to react to trade-offs between services. EDITED BY Christine Fürst","PeriodicalId":31680,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"53 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21513732.2017.1289245","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1289245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

ABSTRACT Species conservation and forage production are both important, yet conflicting components of sustainable grassland management. We modeled forage production and conservation value as dependents in a chain of responses and effects, starting with abiotic environmental conditions that affect the spatial distribution of land uses and biotic ecosystem properties. We asked which relationships in this causal chain determine trade-offs between forage production and conservation value. Abiotic and biotic ecosystem properties were recorded on 46 plots in the coastal marshes of Northwest Germany. Plant and bird conservation values were calculated using Red Lists, and sales of forage-based agricultural products were assessed by interviewing farmers. We used a structural equation model to determine responses and effects. Groundwater depth and salinity represent the ultimate causes for the spatial variation in sales and conservation value. The water gradient translated into more proximate causes, such as land-use intensity affecting aboveground net primary productivity, forage quality, and species richness. Plant species conservation and forage production were segregated along the water gradient, and both bird conservation and forage production depended on grassland management, albeit at different fertilization levels. Our study points to segregation and integration as two spatial strategies to react to trade-offs between services. EDITED BY Christine Fürst
生态系统特性与土地利用之间的相互作用阐明了优化农业与物种保护之间权衡的空间策略
物种保护和草料生产都是草地可持续管理的重要组成部分,但又相互冲突。我们从影响土地利用空间分布和生物生态系统特性的非生物环境条件开始,将饲料生产和保护价值作为一系列响应和效应的依赖关系进行建模。我们问,在这个因果链中,哪些关系决定了饲料生产和保护价值之间的权衡。对德国西北部沿海沼泽的46个样地进行了非生物和生物生态系统特征的记录。利用红色名录计算植物和鸟类的保护价值,并通过对农民的访谈评估以饲料为基础的农产品的销售。我们使用结构方程模型来确定响应和效果。地下水深度和盐度是造成地下水销售价值和保护价值空间差异的根本原因。水梯度转化为更接近的原因,如土地利用强度影响地上净初级生产力、牧草质量和物种丰富度。植物物种保护和饲料生产沿水梯度分离,鸟类保护和饲料生产均依赖于草地管理,尽管施肥水平不同。我们的研究指出,隔离和整合是应对服务之间权衡的两种空间策略。编辑:克里斯汀·费尔斯特
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书