What Role Does the Media Play in Driving Xenophobia?

J. Kleist, A. Loewenstein, Dominique Trudel, Ekaterina S. Zabrovskaya, Sydette Harry
{"title":"What Role Does the Media Play in Driving Xenophobia?","authors":"J. Kleist, A. Loewenstein, Dominique Trudel, Ekaterina S. Zabrovskaya, Sydette Harry","doi":"10.1215/07402775-3903640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The media’s coverage of the 2015 European refugee crisis stood in stark contrast to its xenophobic stereotyping of the early 1990s. Back then, following German reunification, the country saw heightened nationalism, a rise in the number of refugees, a series of racist riots and murders, and constitutional reforms that severely restricted political freedoms. Newspapers published articles about the criminality of foreigners, often using derogatory terms. Until the number of asylum-seekers sharply declined during the mid1990s and the topic of refugees largely vanished, a media-constructed anti-migrant discourse penetrated society. The issue came back into focus in 2013 when refugees began to protest their living conditions. By 2015, the arrival of about 1 million asylum-seekers started to affect everything from personal lives to global politics. Initially, journalists seemed to proceed with care, cognizant of the mistakes of the 1990s. A study by the Hamburg Media School counted 19,000 articles on refugees that year—4,000 more than in the previous six years combined. Four out of five articles took a positive view of refugees, which, the report suggests, helped to reduce negative perceptions in the public overall. Major media outlets, such as Hamburger Abendblatt, had reporters dedicated exclusively to migration issues, allowing for in-depth reporting and research. In tandem with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s assertion, “We will manage,” the major conservative tabloid, Bild, started a campaign, called","PeriodicalId":85888,"journal":{"name":"World policy journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"3 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1215/07402775-3903640","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World policy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-3903640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The media’s coverage of the 2015 European refugee crisis stood in stark contrast to its xenophobic stereotyping of the early 1990s. Back then, following German reunification, the country saw heightened nationalism, a rise in the number of refugees, a series of racist riots and murders, and constitutional reforms that severely restricted political freedoms. Newspapers published articles about the criminality of foreigners, often using derogatory terms. Until the number of asylum-seekers sharply declined during the mid1990s and the topic of refugees largely vanished, a media-constructed anti-migrant discourse penetrated society. The issue came back into focus in 2013 when refugees began to protest their living conditions. By 2015, the arrival of about 1 million asylum-seekers started to affect everything from personal lives to global politics. Initially, journalists seemed to proceed with care, cognizant of the mistakes of the 1990s. A study by the Hamburg Media School counted 19,000 articles on refugees that year—4,000 more than in the previous six years combined. Four out of five articles took a positive view of refugees, which, the report suggests, helped to reduce negative perceptions in the public overall. Major media outlets, such as Hamburger Abendblatt, had reporters dedicated exclusively to migration issues, allowing for in-depth reporting and research. In tandem with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s assertion, “We will manage,” the major conservative tabloid, Bild, started a campaign, called
媒体在推动仇外心理方面扮演什么角色?
媒体对2015年欧洲难民危机的报道与20世纪90年代初的仇外成见形成了鲜明对比。当时,德国统一后,民族主义加剧,难民人数增加,一系列种族主义骚乱和谋杀,宪法改革严重限制了政治自由。报纸发表了关于外国人犯罪的文章,经常使用贬义词。直到20世纪90年代中期,寻求庇护者的数量急剧下降,难民的话题基本消失,媒体构建的反移民话语渗透到了社会中。2013年,当难民开始抗议他们的生活条件时,这个问题再次成为焦点。到2015年,大约100万寻求庇护者的到来开始影响从个人生活到全球政治的方方面面。起初,记者们似乎很谨慎,意识到了20世纪90年代的错误。汉堡媒体学院的一项研究统计了当年19000篇关于难民的文章,比前六年的总和多了4000篇。五分之四的文章对难民持积极看法,报告表明,这有助于减少公众的负面看法。Hamburger Abendblatt等主要媒体都有专门报道移民问题的记者,以便进行深入报道和研究。在总理安格拉·默克尔断言“我们会成功的”的同时,主要的保守派小报《图片报》发起了一场名为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信