COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY IN MALAYSIA: CHALLENGES WITHIN THE LAW AND WAY FORWARD

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Hafidz Hakimi Haron, Nadiah Arsat, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi
{"title":"COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY IN MALAYSIA: CHALLENGES WITHIN THE LAW AND WAY FORWARD","authors":"Hafidz Hakimi Haron, Nadiah Arsat, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v31i1.828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For hundreds of years, vaccines have been a critical tool in the prevention of viral diseases. Vaccination programmes have gained prominence as one of the primary strategies for combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccination programmes have frequently been viewed negatively by many. This is evident by the fact that vaccine hesitancy continues to grow at an unprecedented rate which is much facilitated by the rapid growth of communication and information technology. Despite the fact that vaccines and vaccinations are considered medical products, the difficulties they present are socio-legal in nature. The study examines four major factors that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia namely compulsory vaccination and adverse event following vaccination (AEFI), information disclosure, misleading religious beliefs and sentiments, and misinformation and disinformation. It should be noted that, the identification and discussion of the factors mentioned above are vital as the failure of any future vaccination campaigns resulting from vaccine hesitancy would pose a huge threat to achieve the United Nations' Sustainable Goals (UNSDG), especially in respect of good health and sustainable economic growth. Therefore, for the purpose of this research, the paper adopts qualitative research approach to achieve its objectives. The paper recommends that the Malaysian vaccination legal framework be strengthened.\n ","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i1.828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For hundreds of years, vaccines have been a critical tool in the prevention of viral diseases. Vaccination programmes have gained prominence as one of the primary strategies for combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccination programmes have frequently been viewed negatively by many. This is evident by the fact that vaccine hesitancy continues to grow at an unprecedented rate which is much facilitated by the rapid growth of communication and information technology. Despite the fact that vaccines and vaccinations are considered medical products, the difficulties they present are socio-legal in nature. The study examines four major factors that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia namely compulsory vaccination and adverse event following vaccination (AEFI), information disclosure, misleading religious beliefs and sentiments, and misinformation and disinformation. It should be noted that, the identification and discussion of the factors mentioned above are vital as the failure of any future vaccination campaigns resulting from vaccine hesitancy would pose a huge threat to achieve the United Nations' Sustainable Goals (UNSDG), especially in respect of good health and sustainable economic growth. Therefore, for the purpose of this research, the paper adopts qualitative research approach to achieve its objectives. The paper recommends that the Malaysian vaccination legal framework be strengthened.  
马来西亚新冠肺炎疫苗接种不确定性:法律范围内的挑战和前进道路
数百年来,疫苗一直是预防病毒性疾病的关键工具。作为抗击COVID-19大流行的主要战略之一,疫苗接种规划已获得突出地位。尽管如此,许多人经常对COVID-19疫苗接种规划持负面看法。这一点很明显,因为对疫苗的犹豫继续以前所未有的速度增长,而通信和信息技术的迅速发展大大促进了这一点。尽管疫苗和疫苗接种被视为医疗产品,但它们带来的困难是社会法律性质的。该研究调查了导致马来西亚COVID-19疫苗犹豫的四个主要因素,即强制接种疫苗和接种后不良事件(AEFI)、信息披露、误导性宗教信仰和情绪以及错误信息和虚假信息。应该指出的是,确定和讨论上述因素至关重要,因为由于疫苗犹豫而导致未来任何疫苗接种运动的失败将对实现联合国可持续目标,特别是在良好健康和可持续经济增长方面构成巨大威胁。因此,为了本研究的目的,本文采用定性研究的方法来实现其目的。该文件建议加强马来西亚的疫苗接种法律框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信