El principio de la confianza legítima como modo de prevenir el impacto del cambio en la posición de las autoridades

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Julio Rafael Montoya Barrios, Carlos Alberto Cárdenas Sierra
{"title":"El principio de la confianza legítima como modo de prevenir el impacto del cambio en la posición de las autoridades","authors":"Julio Rafael Montoya Barrios, Carlos Alberto Cárdenas Sierra","doi":"10.21803/penamer.15.30.537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Individuals may trust that their current favorable legal situation will be preserved in the face of unexpected legal, administrative or jurisprudential changes that compromise their legitimate expectations to the point of causing them some minor or major legal damage. Objective: The purpose of this study is to present the principle of legitimate expectations in the context of Colombian law, which has been transforming from a purely legalistic system (civil law) to a system with a strong inclination to adopt the mechanics of precedent (common law) without being able to say that the latter system is fully assumed, either for legal reasons or for social reasons of legal culture that condition the mentality of jurists in general and of legal operators in particular. Conclusions: Can individuals be protected in any way against such unforeseen changes when a legal damage is caused to them? Eventually yes, if the legal system in question has a structure of principles, such as ours, where such principles inspire the justice that has been consolidating around the jurisprudence that has developed Article 83 of the Political Constitution which deals with the presumption of good faith and how it extends in terms of legal security to the confidence of individuals that they will not be surprised with unexpected changes forcing the State in specific cases to recognize transition periods in terms of the adaptation of citizens to the new legal regime (legal, administrative or jurisprudential).","PeriodicalId":40337,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pensamiento Americano","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pensamiento Americano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.15.30.537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals may trust that their current favorable legal situation will be preserved in the face of unexpected legal, administrative or jurisprudential changes that compromise their legitimate expectations to the point of causing them some minor or major legal damage. Objective: The purpose of this study is to present the principle of legitimate expectations in the context of Colombian law, which has been transforming from a purely legalistic system (civil law) to a system with a strong inclination to adopt the mechanics of precedent (common law) without being able to say that the latter system is fully assumed, either for legal reasons or for social reasons of legal culture that condition the mentality of jurists in general and of legal operators in particular. Conclusions: Can individuals be protected in any way against such unforeseen changes when a legal damage is caused to them? Eventually yes, if the legal system in question has a structure of principles, such as ours, where such principles inspire the justice that has been consolidating around the jurisprudence that has developed Article 83 of the Political Constitution which deals with the presumption of good faith and how it extends in terms of legal security to the confidence of individuals that they will not be surprised with unexpected changes forcing the State in specific cases to recognize transition periods in terms of the adaptation of citizens to the new legal regime (legal, administrative or jurisprudential).
合法期望原则是防止改变对当局立场的影响的一种手段
引言:个人可能相信,面对意想不到的法律、行政或法理上的变化,他们目前有利的法律状况将得到保护,这些变化会损害他们的合法期望,从而给他们造成一些或大或小的法律损害。摘要目的:本研究的目的是提出的原则合法预期在哥伦比亚法律的背景下,已将从纯法律(民法)系统与强烈倾向于采用力学的先例(普通法)不能够说后者系统完全承担,由于法律原因或原因社会条件的心态法学家的法律文化、特别是合法经营资格的。结论:当法律损害对个人造成损害时,个人是否能够以任何方式受到保护,免受这种不可预见的变化的影响?最终是的,如果有问题的法律体系有一个原则结构,比如我们的,这些原则所激发的正义一直围绕着制定了《政治宪法》第83条的判例而巩固,该条涉及诚信的假设,以及它如何从法律保障的角度扩展到个人的信心,即他们不会对意外的变化感到惊讶,这些变化迫使国家在具体情况下承认公民适应新的法律制度的过渡时期(法律、行政的或法理的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Pensamiento Americano
Revista Pensamiento Americano SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书