Democracy and Social Policy in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Process Tracing Analysis

Jurnal Politik Pub Date : 2020-04-10 DOI:10.7454/JP.V5I2.266
Fadillah Putra, M. Aminuddin
{"title":"Democracy and Social Policy in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Process Tracing Analysis","authors":"Fadillah Putra, M. Aminuddin","doi":"10.7454/JP.V5I2.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between democracy and social policy in Southeast Asia is a critical topic that has received insufficient attention. In general, trends in improving social policy as part of the government’s responsibility for citizens do not follow the trend of democratization. Even in autocratic countries, improving the quality of social policy is always a priority. This study answers the following question: what can the trend of improvement in social policy explain in relation to democratization at the state level? Through the comparative process tracing analysis method, this study demonstrated a discriminatory treatment factor in providing access to public services to certain groups related to the political forces that had been controlling the government. In addition, this study reveals several factors that have not been widely explained from the periodization of social policy changes in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines.","PeriodicalId":32549,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Politik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/JP.V5I2.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The relationship between democracy and social policy in Southeast Asia is a critical topic that has received insufficient attention. In general, trends in improving social policy as part of the government’s responsibility for citizens do not follow the trend of democratization. Even in autocratic countries, improving the quality of social policy is always a priority. This study answers the following question: what can the trend of improvement in social policy explain in relation to democratization at the state level? Through the comparative process tracing analysis method, this study demonstrated a discriminatory treatment factor in providing access to public services to certain groups related to the political forces that had been controlling the government. In addition, this study reveals several factors that have not been widely explained from the periodization of social policy changes in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines.
东南亚的民主与社会政策:比较过程追踪分析
东南亚的民主与社会政策之间的关系是一个没有得到足够关注的关键话题。总的来说,作为政府对公民责任的一部分,改善社会政策的趋势并不符合民主化的趋势。即使在专制国家,提高社会政策的质量始终是优先事项。这项研究回答了以下问题:社会政策的改善趋势可以解释国家层面民主化的原因是什么?通过比较过程追踪分析方法,本研究表明,在向与控制政府的政治力量有关的某些群体提供公共服务方面存在歧视性待遇因素。此外,本研究揭示了印度尼西亚、马来西亚、泰国和菲律宾社会政策变化的阶段性尚未得到广泛解释的几个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信