UNDERSTANDING WHY MOTHERS CAN LOSE CHILD CUSTODY IN MALAYSIA

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Kadir, R. Abdullah, Safiek Mokhlis
{"title":"UNDERSTANDING WHY MOTHERS CAN LOSE CHILD CUSTODY IN MALAYSIA","authors":"R. Kadir, R. Abdullah, Safiek Mokhlis","doi":"10.32890/UUMJLS2021.12.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Custody decisions are tailored to the circumstances of each case based on related principles with protection of child welfare as courts’ paramount consideration. This paper seeks to understand custody issue from quantitative viewpoint through a conceptual model and examines how child custody principles have influenced loss decisions for mothers. The methodology used was content analysis and Chi-Square correlation, with usable data provided by 47 cases decided in Malaysia between 1987 and 2017 based on Act 303. Coding instrument and conceptual framework were developed with items covering presumption of maternal custody, custodian qualification and loss of rights, child’s and mother’s wishes. The findings revealed that mothers were less likely to lose custody cases and when they did their defeats were strongly influenced by factors relating to children’s preference and status quo arrangement. The results contribute to an understanding of how mothers can lose custody of their children and clarify whether some of the independent variables are used more regularly and are more predictive of the loss decisions than the others.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/UUMJLS2021.12.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Custody decisions are tailored to the circumstances of each case based on related principles with protection of child welfare as courts’ paramount consideration. This paper seeks to understand custody issue from quantitative viewpoint through a conceptual model and examines how child custody principles have influenced loss decisions for mothers. The methodology used was content analysis and Chi-Square correlation, with usable data provided by 47 cases decided in Malaysia between 1987 and 2017 based on Act 303. Coding instrument and conceptual framework were developed with items covering presumption of maternal custody, custodian qualification and loss of rights, child’s and mother’s wishes. The findings revealed that mothers were less likely to lose custody cases and when they did their defeats were strongly influenced by factors relating to children’s preference and status quo arrangement. The results contribute to an understanding of how mothers can lose custody of their children and clarify whether some of the independent variables are used more regularly and are more predictive of the loss decisions than the others.
了解为什么马来西亚的母亲会失去孩子的监护权
监护决定是根据每个案件的情况根据法院以保护儿童福利为首要考虑的相关原则作出的。本文试图通过一个概念模型从定量的角度来理解监护问题,并研究儿童监护原则如何影响母亲的损失决策。使用的方法是内容分析和卡方相关性,并根据1987年至2017年根据第303号法案在马来西亚判决的47个案件提供了可用数据。制定了编码文书和概念框架,其中包括推定母亲监护权、监护人资格和权利丧失、儿童和母亲的愿望。调查结果显示,母亲在监护权案件中败诉的可能性较小,而当她们败诉时,她们的败诉受到与子女偏好和现状安排有关的因素的强烈影响。研究结果有助于理解母亲是如何失去孩子监护权的,并澄清一些自变量是否比其他自变量使用得更频繁,是否更能预测失去孩子的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信