Coronal Alignment in TKA: Traditional Principles Versus New Concepts

T. Parisi, J. Jennings, D. Dennis
{"title":"Coronal Alignment in TKA: Traditional Principles Versus New Concepts","authors":"T. Parisi, J. Jennings, D. Dennis","doi":"10.15438/rr.8.2.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Up to 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are not satisfied with their outcome, and coronal alignment is considered an important variable in attaining a well-functioning TKA. Neutral mechanical alignment is not necessarily the anatomic norm and has led some surgeons to advocate a shift in defining and attaining the optimal coronal component alignment. Our aim was to review the different coronal alignment paradigms of TKA and summarize the historical and contemporary outcomes of different alignment techniques.Methods: A systematic review was performed in March 2017 via PubMed using the search terms: coronal alignment, kinematic alignment, and total knee replacement using Boolean “and” in-between terms. Relevant results were then reviewed, analyzed and summarized Conclusions: Early clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned TKAs are promising, but long-term clinical results are unknown. Clinical, laboratory, and retrieval studies suggest that mechanical varus in TKA, especially involving the tibial component, may result in earlier failure. Kinematic alignment with boundaries may be an optimal strategy for patients with pre-operative constitutional varus or congenital tibia vara.","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.8.2.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Up to 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are not satisfied with their outcome, and coronal alignment is considered an important variable in attaining a well-functioning TKA. Neutral mechanical alignment is not necessarily the anatomic norm and has led some surgeons to advocate a shift in defining and attaining the optimal coronal component alignment. Our aim was to review the different coronal alignment paradigms of TKA and summarize the historical and contemporary outcomes of different alignment techniques.Methods: A systematic review was performed in March 2017 via PubMed using the search terms: coronal alignment, kinematic alignment, and total knee replacement using Boolean “and” in-between terms. Relevant results were then reviewed, analyzed and summarized Conclusions: Early clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned TKAs are promising, but long-term clinical results are unknown. Clinical, laboratory, and retrieval studies suggest that mechanical varus in TKA, especially involving the tibial component, may result in earlier failure. Kinematic alignment with boundaries may be an optimal strategy for patients with pre-operative constitutional varus or congenital tibia vara.
TKA中的日冕对齐:传统原则与新概念
背景:高达20%的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者对其结果不满意,冠状位对齐被认为是获得功能良好的TKA的一个重要变量。中性机械对准不一定是解剖学规范,并导致一些外科医生主张在定义和实现最佳冠状组件对准方面进行转变。我们的目的是回顾TKA的不同冠状排列模式,并总结不同排列技术的历史和当代结果。方法:2017年3月,通过PubMed进行了一项系统综述,检索词为:冠状位对齐、运动学对齐和全膝关节置换术,检索词之间使用布尔“和”。随后对相关结果进行了回顾、分析和总结。结论:运动学对准TKA的早期临床结果是有希望的,但长期临床结果尚不清楚。临床、实验室和检索研究表明,TKA的机械性内翻,尤其是涉及胫骨部件的内翻,可能导致早期失败。对于术前宪法性内翻或先天性胫骨内翻的患者来说,与边界的运动对齐可能是一种最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信