{"title":"I fraintendimenti del “genere”: riflessioni sulla legge italiana sul “femminicidio”","authors":"F. Monceri","doi":"10.9732/2022.v124.984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"sezione, commento le singole previsioni, i termini e i presupposti sottostanti alla legge. Infine, nella terza sezione, presento le mie considerazioni critiche, movendo dall’idea che questa legge riproduce presupposti eteronormativi, principalmente a causa di una scorretta definizione del termine “genere”, inteso come un equivalente per “le donne”. ABSTRACT: On October 15th, 2013 the Legislative Decree of August 14th, 2013, n. 93, passed, with amendments, into a Law (n. 119/2013), known in the media and the public opinion as “Law against Feminicide”, although the word feminicide is not to be found either in the title or the text. After a brief premise in which I contextualize the bill under discussion, in the first section I address the question concerning the reasons why it is possible to insert this law within the wider debate on femicide/feminicide. In the second section, I comment the single provisions, the deployed terms and the underlying assumptions of the law. Finally, in the third section, I present my theoretical criticism to the assumptions of the law, moving from the idea that this law reproduces heteronormative assumptions, mainly due to a mistaken definition of “gender”, understood as an equivalent term for “women”.","PeriodicalId":53782,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9732/2022.v124.984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
sezione, commento le singole previsioni, i termini e i presupposti sottostanti alla legge. Infine, nella terza sezione, presento le mie considerazioni critiche, movendo dall’idea che questa legge riproduce presupposti eteronormativi, principalmente a causa di una scorretta definizione del termine “genere”, inteso come un equivalente per “le donne”. ABSTRACT: On October 15th, 2013 the Legislative Decree of August 14th, 2013, n. 93, passed, with amendments, into a Law (n. 119/2013), known in the media and the public opinion as “Law against Feminicide”, although the word feminicide is not to be found either in the title or the text. After a brief premise in which I contextualize the bill under discussion, in the first section I address the question concerning the reasons why it is possible to insert this law within the wider debate on femicide/feminicide. In the second section, I comment the single provisions, the deployed terms and the underlying assumptions of the law. Finally, in the third section, I present my theoretical criticism to the assumptions of the law, moving from the idea that this law reproduces heteronormative assumptions, mainly due to a mistaken definition of “gender”, understood as an equivalent term for “women”.