I fraintendimenti del “genere”: riflessioni sulla legge italiana sul “femminicidio”

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
F. Monceri
{"title":"I fraintendimenti del “genere”: riflessioni sulla legge italiana sul “femminicidio”","authors":"F. Monceri","doi":"10.9732/2022.v124.984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"sezione, commento le singole previsioni, i termini e i presupposti sottostanti alla legge. Infine, nella terza sezione, presento le mie considerazioni critiche, movendo dall’idea che questa legge riproduce presupposti eteronormativi, principalmente a causa di una scorretta definizione del termine “genere”, inteso come un equivalente per “le donne”. ABSTRACT: On October 15th, 2013 the Legislative Decree of August 14th, 2013, n. 93, passed, with amendments, into a Law (n. 119/2013), known in the media and the public opinion as “Law against Feminicide”, although the word feminicide is not to be found either in the title or the text. After a brief premise in which I contextualize the bill under discussion, in the first section I address the question concerning the reasons why it is possible to insert this law within the wider debate on femicide/feminicide. In the second section, I comment the single provisions, the deployed terms and the underlying assumptions of the law. Finally, in the third section, I present my theoretical criticism to the assumptions of the law, moving from the idea that this law reproduces heteronormative assumptions, mainly due to a mistaken definition of “gender”, understood as an equivalent term for “women”.","PeriodicalId":53782,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9732/2022.v124.984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

sezione, commento le singole previsioni, i termini e i presupposti sottostanti alla legge. Infine, nella terza sezione, presento le mie considerazioni critiche, movendo dall’idea che questa legge riproduce presupposti eteronormativi, principalmente a causa di una scorretta definizione del termine “genere”, inteso come un equivalente per “le donne”. ABSTRACT: On October 15th, 2013 the Legislative Decree of August 14th, 2013, n. 93, passed, with amendments, into a Law (n. 119/2013), known in the media and the public opinion as “Law against Feminicide”, although the word feminicide is not to be found either in the title or the text. After a brief premise in which I contextualize the bill under discussion, in the first section I address the question concerning the reasons why it is possible to insert this law within the wider debate on femicide/feminicide. In the second section, I comment the single provisions, the deployed terms and the underlying assumptions of the law. Finally, in the third section, I present my theoretical criticism to the assumptions of the law, moving from the idea that this law reproduces heteronormative assumptions, mainly due to a mistaken definition of “gender”, understood as an equivalent term for “women”.
对“性别”的误解——对意大利“杀害女性”法律的思考
Sezione,评论一个单一的前提,我终止了我的前提,因为我的前提是要有一个完整的基础。无限大的是,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”,“新事物”。摘要:2013年10月15日,2013年8月14日第93号法令经修订后通过,成为一部法律(n. 119/2013),在媒体和舆论中被称为“反对杀害女性法”,尽管在标题和文本中都找不到“杀害女性”一词。在简要介绍了正在讨论的法案的背景之后,我在第一部分中讨论了为什么有可能将这项法律纳入关于杀害妇女/杀害妇女的更广泛辩论的问题。在第二部分中,我对法律的单一条款、部署条款和基本假设进行了评论。最后,在第三部分,我提出了我对法律假设的理论批评,从这个法律复制异性规范假设的观点出发,主要是由于对“性别”的错误定义,被理解为“女性”的等同术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信