Interspecific oral rabies vaccine bait competition in the Southeast United States

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Wesley C. Dixon , Jacob E. Hill , Richard B. Chipman , Amy J. Davis , Amy T. Gilbert , James C. Beasley , Olin E. Rhodes Jr. , Guha Dharmarajan
{"title":"Interspecific oral rabies vaccine bait competition in the Southeast United States","authors":"Wesley C. Dixon ,&nbsp;Jacob E. Hill ,&nbsp;Richard B. Chipman ,&nbsp;Amy J. Davis ,&nbsp;Amy T. Gilbert ,&nbsp;James C. Beasley ,&nbsp;Olin E. Rhodes Jr. ,&nbsp;Guha Dharmarajan","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The United States Department of Agriculture’s National Rabies Management Program (NRMP) has coordinated the use of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) to control the spread of raccoon rabies virus variant west of the Appalachian Mountains since 1997. Working with state and local partners, the NRMP deploys ORV baits containing a </span>rabies vaccine, primarily targeting raccoon populations (</span><span><em>Procyon lotor</em></span><span>). Bait competition between raccoons and non-target species may limit the effectiveness of ORV programs, but the extent of bait competition remains poorly quantified, particularly in the southeastern United States. We placed placebo<span> ORV baits in bottomland hardwood (n = 637 baits) and upland pine (n = 681 baits) habitats in South Carolina, USA during August-December 2019 and used remote cameras to examine bait competition between raccoons and non-target species. The estimated proportion of bait consumed by raccoons was 18.8 ± 2.1% in bottomland hardwood and 11.6 ± 2.1% in upland pine habitats. Vertebrate competition appeared to have a minimal effect on raccoon uptake as estimated consumption did not exceed 5% for any species or 8% of bait uptake events cumulatively. We estimated that raccoons were the primary consumer of baits in bottomland hardwood, whereas invertebrates were the primary consumer in upland pine (26.7 ± 1.3% of baits). Our results indicate a need to closely consider the effects of invertebrates on bait consumption to minimize their potential impact on ORV bait uptake by target species. Uptake probabilities by raccoons were relatively low but not primarily driven by competition with vertebrates. As such, strategies to increase the specificity of raccoon uptake may be needed to enhance the effectiveness of ORV baiting programs.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 105897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159123000692","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The United States Department of Agriculture’s National Rabies Management Program (NRMP) has coordinated the use of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) to control the spread of raccoon rabies virus variant west of the Appalachian Mountains since 1997. Working with state and local partners, the NRMP deploys ORV baits containing a rabies vaccine, primarily targeting raccoon populations (Procyon lotor). Bait competition between raccoons and non-target species may limit the effectiveness of ORV programs, but the extent of bait competition remains poorly quantified, particularly in the southeastern United States. We placed placebo ORV baits in bottomland hardwood (n = 637 baits) and upland pine (n = 681 baits) habitats in South Carolina, USA during August-December 2019 and used remote cameras to examine bait competition between raccoons and non-target species. The estimated proportion of bait consumed by raccoons was 18.8 ± 2.1% in bottomland hardwood and 11.6 ± 2.1% in upland pine habitats. Vertebrate competition appeared to have a minimal effect on raccoon uptake as estimated consumption did not exceed 5% for any species or 8% of bait uptake events cumulatively. We estimated that raccoons were the primary consumer of baits in bottomland hardwood, whereas invertebrates were the primary consumer in upland pine (26.7 ± 1.3% of baits). Our results indicate a need to closely consider the effects of invertebrates on bait consumption to minimize their potential impact on ORV bait uptake by target species. Uptake probabilities by raccoons were relatively low but not primarily driven by competition with vertebrates. As such, strategies to increase the specificity of raccoon uptake may be needed to enhance the effectiveness of ORV baiting programs.

美国东南部的种间口服狂犬病疫苗诱饵竞争
自1997年以来,美国农业部的国家狂犬病管理计划(NRMP)协调使用口服狂犬病疫苗(ORV)来控制阿巴拉契亚山脉西部浣熊狂犬病病毒变种的传播。NRMP与州和地方伙伴合作,部署含有狂犬病疫苗的ORV诱饵,主要针对浣熊种群(Procyon lotor)。浣熊和非目标物种之间的诱饵竞争可能会限制ORV计划的有效性,但诱饵竞争的程度仍然缺乏量化,特别是在美国东南部。2019年8月至12月,我们在美国南卡罗来纳州的洼地硬木(n = 637个诱饵)和高地松树(n = 681个诱饵)栖息地放置了安慰剂ORV诱饵,并使用远程摄像机研究了浣熊和非目标物种之间的诱饵竞争。滩涂阔叶林和高地松林生境的饵料摄取率分别为18.8±2.1%和11.6±2.1%。脊椎动物的竞争似乎对浣熊摄取的影响最小,因为任何物种的估计消耗量都不超过5%,或累计不超过诱饵摄取事件的8%。我们估计,浣熊是低地硬木饵料的主要消费者,而无脊椎动物是高地松木饵料的主要消费者(26.7±1.3%)。我们的研究结果表明,需要密切考虑无脊椎动物对饵料消耗的影响,以尽量减少它们对目标物种对ORV饵料吸收的潜在影响。浣熊摄取的可能性相对较低,但主要不是由于与脊椎动物的竞争。因此,可能需要提高浣熊摄取特异性的策略来提高ORV诱饵计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信