Curators, objects and the indigenous agency

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2021.1962036

M. Křížová

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The article deals with specific field within the history of science: the institutional as well as biographical history of anthropological and archaeological museums. Through several case studies, more general questions are explored, those that inquire into the role of museums in delineating the agenda of anthropology and archaeology; the role of leading personalities of this discipline in envisioning and operating the museum institutions; the relationships between museums and governing institutions in national and (post)colonial contexts, and the interaction of museum with the general public, and specifically with the indigenous groups – that is, the very groups archaeology and anthropology are aiming to study.

查看原文本刊更多论文

策展人，物品和土著机构

摘要本文论述了科学史上的特定领域：人类学和考古博物馆的机构史和传记史。通过几个案例研究，探索了更普遍的问题，这些问题探讨了博物馆在界定人类学和考古学议程方面的作用；该学科的领军人物在设想和运营博物馆机构方面的作用；国家和（后）殖民地背景下博物馆与管理机构之间的关系，以及博物馆与公众的互动，特别是与土著群体的互动，也就是考古学和人类学想要研究的群体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.