{"title":"Historical corruption in a ‘non-corrupt’ society: Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"R. Gregory, Daniel R. Zirker","doi":"10.1108/pap-01-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reconsider, from a historical perspective, New Zealand’s reputation as a country largely without corruption, with particular reference to the colonial government’s confiscation of Māori land in the 19th century and beyond.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on published historical commentary.FindingsThe findings are that much of the Māori land confiscation was rendered legal for illegitimate purposes, and that the colonial and successive New Zealand governments abrogated the country’s foundational document, the Treaty of Waitangi, signed between the colonial government and many Māori chiefs in 1840. Adverse consequences for Māori have been felt to this day, despite the Treaty settlements process that began with the Māori renaissance in the mid-1970s.Originality/valueThe academic analysis of corruption in New Zealand has seldom if ever adopted this historical perspective.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-01-2022-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reconsider, from a historical perspective, New Zealand’s reputation as a country largely without corruption, with particular reference to the colonial government’s confiscation of Māori land in the 19th century and beyond.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on published historical commentary.FindingsThe findings are that much of the Māori land confiscation was rendered legal for illegitimate purposes, and that the colonial and successive New Zealand governments abrogated the country’s foundational document, the Treaty of Waitangi, signed between the colonial government and many Māori chiefs in 1840. Adverse consequences for Māori have been felt to this day, despite the Treaty settlements process that began with the Māori renaissance in the mid-1970s.Originality/valueThe academic analysis of corruption in New Zealand has seldom if ever adopted this historical perspective.
本文的目的是从历史的角度重新考虑新西兰作为一个基本上没有腐败的国家的声誉,特别是参考19世纪及以后殖民政府没收Māori土地。设计/方法/方法本文基于已发表的历史评论。调查结果发现,大部分Māori土地没收都是出于非法目的而合法的,殖民地和后来的新西兰政府废除了该国的基础文件——1840年殖民政府与许多Māori酋长签署的《怀唐伊条约》(Treaty of Waitangi)。尽管从1970年代中期Māori复兴开始的《条约》解决进程至今仍对Māori产生不利影响。对新西兰腐败的学术分析很少采用这种历史视角。