EXAMINING CONSTITUTIONAL AWARENESS AND STRENGTHENING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY

R. M. Sukmariningsih
{"title":"EXAMINING CONSTITUTIONAL AWARENESS AND STRENGTHENING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY","authors":"R. M. Sukmariningsih","doi":"10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.24722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is aimed to review constitutional awareness and decision-strengthening practice in judicial institutions. As it turns out in practice, however, the legal decisions are still debatable in reality. The practice of abuse of authority in the judiciary tends to damage the pillars of the judiciary and result in a decline in trust and certainly the authority of the judiciary against society. It is a normative legal research (doctrinal research). The approach used is qualitative analysis and the application of legislation. The results of research indicate that the strengthening of the judge’ decision can be started from the quality of decision through a comprehensive and mind-opened dimension, so that it is necessary to increase the pattern of development not only by the judges but also by all relevant stakeholders such as the Secretariat General and the Registrar Apparats. The focus of development is not only about knowledge but also it was conducted from all aspects such as mental and spiritual development that conducted continuously. The consequences of providing sufficient budget to realize it and in its implementation are conducted with full responsibility.","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.24722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is aimed to review constitutional awareness and decision-strengthening practice in judicial institutions. As it turns out in practice, however, the legal decisions are still debatable in reality. The practice of abuse of authority in the judiciary tends to damage the pillars of the judiciary and result in a decline in trust and certainly the authority of the judiciary against society. It is a normative legal research (doctrinal research). The approach used is qualitative analysis and the application of legislation. The results of research indicate that the strengthening of the judge’ decision can be started from the quality of decision through a comprehensive and mind-opened dimension, so that it is necessary to increase the pattern of development not only by the judges but also by all relevant stakeholders such as the Secretariat General and the Registrar Apparats. The focus of development is not only about knowledge but also it was conducted from all aspects such as mental and spiritual development that conducted continuously. The consequences of providing sufficient budget to realize it and in its implementation are conducted with full responsibility.
审视宪法意识加强司法公正
本文旨在回顾司法机构的宪法意识与强化决策实践。然而,在实践中,法律决定在现实中仍然存在争议。司法机构滥用权力的做法往往会损害司法的支柱,导致对社会的信任下降,当然也会削弱司法机构的权威。它是一种规范性的法律研究(理论研究)。所采用的方法是定性分析和立法应用。研究结果表明,加强法官判决可以从判决质量入手,通过一个全面和开放的维度,因此不仅需要法官,而且需要秘书处和书记官长等所有利益攸关方的发展模式。发展的重点不仅仅是知识,而是从各个方面进行的,如不断进行的心理和精神发展。为实现这一目标提供充足的预算并在其执行过程中承担全部责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信