{"title":"Hacia una reinterpretación del artículo VI del Título Preliminar del Código Civil: en la búsqueda de los parámetros del “interés para obrar”","authors":"Eugenia Ariano Deho","doi":"10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses Article VI of the Preliminary Title of the Civil Code for the purpose of determining its current usefulness. For this purpose it goes back to the origins and sense of the French maxim “interest is the measure of actions”, its reception in the Italian Procedural Code of 1865 and successive conceptual developments, going so far as to argue that article VI analyzed contains the parameters (legitimate, economic or moral usefulness) needed to establish the existence of what the Civil Procedural Code calls “interés para obrar”, that is, if the requested (or a substantive defense) is appropriate to receive a substantive decision.","PeriodicalId":31485,"journal":{"name":"Ius Et Veritas","volume":"1 1","pages":"104-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Et Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper analyses Article VI of the Preliminary Title of the Civil Code for the purpose of determining its current usefulness. For this purpose it goes back to the origins and sense of the French maxim “interest is the measure of actions”, its reception in the Italian Procedural Code of 1865 and successive conceptual developments, going so far as to argue that article VI analyzed contains the parameters (legitimate, economic or moral usefulness) needed to establish the existence of what the Civil Procedural Code calls “interés para obrar”, that is, if the requested (or a substantive defense) is appropriate to receive a substantive decision.
本文对民法典初编第六条进行了分析,以确定其目前的适用性。为此,它可以追溯到法国格言“利益是行动的衡量标准”的起源和意义,它在1865年《意大利诉讼法》中的接受以及随后的概念发展,甚至认为,所分析的第六条包含了确定《民事诉讼法》所称的“interés para obrar”的存在所需的参数(合法、经济或道德有用性),也就是说,如果所请求的(或实质性辩护)适合接受实质性裁决。