Preoperative waiting time and outcomes of non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries: Insights from a zonal referral hospital in northern Tanzania, a reference for health centers with similar capacities

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Godfrey M. Mchele , Ally H. Mwanga , Daniel W. Kitua , Samwel Chugulu
{"title":"Preoperative waiting time and outcomes of non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries: Insights from a zonal referral hospital in northern Tanzania, a reference for health centers with similar capacities","authors":"Godfrey M. Mchele ,&nbsp;Ally H. Mwanga ,&nbsp;Daniel W. Kitua ,&nbsp;Samwel Chugulu","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries are common in most healthcare settings. To a significant extent, the outcomes of treatment are determined by the promptness of surgical interventions. However, the in-hospital waiting time which reflects perioperative promptness remains largely unexplored in developing countries.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the preoperative waiting time, identify the causes of delays, and determine subsequent outcomes for non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted at a consultant zonal hospital in northern Tanzania from September 2012 to March 2013. Patients admitted and surgically treated for non-traumatic acute abdominal conditions were consecutively sampled. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. Delays in surgical interventions were assessed based on observations at the Emergency Department and record analysis. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to summarize the data and assess for factors influencing post-operative outcomes, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 111 participants with a median age of 29 years (IQR=18-53). The median in-hospital preoperative waiting was 10.5 hours (IQR=6.6-14.7), with a substantial majority (78.4%) experiencing delays beyond 6 hours. The frequent reasons for delayed surgery included personnel shortage (37.8%), unavailable theater space (31.5%), and investigation-related factors (28.8%). Delayed hospital presentation (symptoms ≥24 hours) (OR=3.9, 95% CI=1.0-14.9) and prolonged waiting time (&gt;6 hours) (OR=2.7, 95% CI=1.0-7.2) were significantly associated (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) with in-hospital complications that included wound dehiscence (0.9%), re-operation (3.6%), surgical site infection (18.0%), and complications necessitating Intensive Care Unit admission (36.9%). The in-hospital operative mortality rate was 18.0%. Age of ≤40 years (OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.04-0.4) and ASA-PS class I-II (OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.0-0.3) were identified as significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) protective factors against operative mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These benchmark findings highlight the multifactorial nature of the reasons for delayed surgical interventions and its association with postoperative complications; offering a potential avenue to enhance surgical efficiency in the index and comparable settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries are common in most healthcare settings. To a significant extent, the outcomes of treatment are determined by the promptness of surgical interventions. However, the in-hospital waiting time which reflects perioperative promptness remains largely unexplored in developing countries.

Objective

To describe the preoperative waiting time, identify the causes of delays, and determine subsequent outcomes for non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgeries.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a consultant zonal hospital in northern Tanzania from September 2012 to March 2013. Patients admitted and surgically treated for non-traumatic acute abdominal conditions were consecutively sampled. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. Delays in surgical interventions were assessed based on observations at the Emergency Department and record analysis. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to summarize the data and assess for factors influencing post-operative outcomes, respectively.

Results

The study included 111 participants with a median age of 29 years (IQR=18-53). The median in-hospital preoperative waiting was 10.5 hours (IQR=6.6-14.7), with a substantial majority (78.4%) experiencing delays beyond 6 hours. The frequent reasons for delayed surgery included personnel shortage (37.8%), unavailable theater space (31.5%), and investigation-related factors (28.8%). Delayed hospital presentation (symptoms ≥24 hours) (OR=3.9, 95% CI=1.0-14.9) and prolonged waiting time (>6 hours) (OR=2.7, 95% CI=1.0-7.2) were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with in-hospital complications that included wound dehiscence (0.9%), re-operation (3.6%), surgical site infection (18.0%), and complications necessitating Intensive Care Unit admission (36.9%). The in-hospital operative mortality rate was 18.0%. Age of ≤40 years (OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.04-0.4) and ASA-PS class I-II (OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.0-0.3) were identified as significant (P < 0.001) protective factors against operative mortality.

Conclusion

These benchmark findings highlight the multifactorial nature of the reasons for delayed surgical interventions and its association with postoperative complications; offering a potential avenue to enhance surgical efficiency in the index and comparable settings.

非创伤性紧急腹部手术的术前等待时间和结果:来自坦桑尼亚北部地区转诊医院的见解,为具有类似能力的卫生中心提供参考
背景:非创伤性紧急腹部手术在大多数医疗机构中很常见。在很大程度上,手术干预的及时性决定了治疗的结果。然而,在发展中国家,反映围手术期及时性的住院等待时间在很大程度上仍未得到探索。目的描述非创伤性紧急腹部手术的术前等待时间,确定延误的原因,并确定随后的结果。方法于2012年9月至2013年3月在坦桑尼亚北部地区一家咨询医院进行横断面研究。非创伤性急腹症住院和手术治疗的患者连续取样。从医疗记录中获得社会人口学和临床数据。根据在急诊科的观察和记录分析评估手术干预的延误。采用描述性统计和回归分析对资料进行总结,对影响术后疗效的因素进行评估。结果研究纳入111例参与者,中位年龄29岁(IQR=18-53)。住院术前等待时间中位数为10.5小时(IQR=6.6-14.7),绝大多数(78.4%)患者的等待时间超过6小时。延迟手术的常见原因包括人员短缺(37.8%)、没有手术室空间(31.5%)和调查相关因素(28.8%)。延迟住院(症状≥24小时)(OR=3.9, 95% CI=1.0-14.9)和延长等待时间(>6小时)(OR=2.7, 95% CI=1.0-7.2)显著相关(P <0.05),住院并发症包括伤口裂开(0.9%)、再次手术(3.6%)、手术部位感染(18.0%)和需要入住重症监护病房的并发症(36.9%)。住院手术死亡率为18.0%。年龄≤40岁(OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.04-0.4)和ASA-PS I-II级(OR=0.1, 95% CI=0.0-0.3)被认为具有显著性(P <0.001)手术死亡率的保护因素。结论这些基准研究结果突出了延迟手术干预的多因素性质及其与术后并发症的关系;提供一个潜在的途径,以提高手术效率在指数和可比设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信