{"title":"Locusts and Grasshoppers Acridoidea Ethnobiology of the South American Gran Chaco: A Review","authors":"Nicolás M. Kamienkowski","doi":"10.2993/0278-0771-42.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Migratory locusts are among the most damaging agricultural plagues in the world. However, the role of grasshoppers and locusts in human societies embraces other cultural dimensions. For the Gran Chaco (an immense plain located in the west of Paraguay, the north of Argentina, a small portion of the south-west of Brazil, and part of the east of Bolivia), the documentation available contains no clear description of the topic, although information is scattered throughout a variety of bibliographic sources. This study presents a synthesis of the significance and role of locusts and grasshoppers for Indigenous communities of the Gran Chaco. It is the result of an exhaustive bibliographic review of the region, as well as fieldwork conducted with various Toba communities. The resulting information has been organized by cultural topic. The references come under ten headings: food, damage, shamanism, fishing, toponyms, names of bands, textile art, string games, oral narrative, and vernacular nomenclature. Details describing forms of gathering and consumption, present and past uses, as well as the reasons why they were abandoned, were recorded, along with negative assessments and the fear experienced at the arrival of swarms of locusts. This synthesis allows reconstruction of a historical cultural aspect of the Gran Chaco which has received little attention, while recording prevailing cultural aspects and others that have fallen into disuse.","PeriodicalId":54838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-42.3.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Migratory locusts are among the most damaging agricultural plagues in the world. However, the role of grasshoppers and locusts in human societies embraces other cultural dimensions. For the Gran Chaco (an immense plain located in the west of Paraguay, the north of Argentina, a small portion of the south-west of Brazil, and part of the east of Bolivia), the documentation available contains no clear description of the topic, although information is scattered throughout a variety of bibliographic sources. This study presents a synthesis of the significance and role of locusts and grasshoppers for Indigenous communities of the Gran Chaco. It is the result of an exhaustive bibliographic review of the region, as well as fieldwork conducted with various Toba communities. The resulting information has been organized by cultural topic. The references come under ten headings: food, damage, shamanism, fishing, toponyms, names of bands, textile art, string games, oral narrative, and vernacular nomenclature. Details describing forms of gathering and consumption, present and past uses, as well as the reasons why they were abandoned, were recorded, along with negative assessments and the fear experienced at the arrival of swarms of locusts. This synthesis allows reconstruction of a historical cultural aspect of the Gran Chaco which has received little attention, while recording prevailing cultural aspects and others that have fallen into disuse.
期刊介绍:
JoE’s readership is as wide and diverse as ethnobiology itself, with readers spanning from both the natural and social sciences. Not surprisingly, a glance at the papers published in the Journal reveals the depth and breadth of topics, extending from studies in archaeology and the origins of agriculture, to folk classification systems, to food composition, plants, birds, mammals, fungi and everything in between.
Research areas published in JoE include but are not limited to neo- and paleo-ethnobiology, zooarchaeology, ethnobotany, ethnozoology, ethnopharmacology, ethnoecology, linguistic ethnobiology, human paleoecology, and many other related fields of study within anthropology and biology, such as taxonomy, conservation biology, ethnography, political ecology, and cognitive and cultural anthropology.
JoE does not limit itself to a single perspective, approach or discipline, but seeks to represent the full spectrum and wide diversity of the field of ethnobiology, including cognitive, symbolic, linguistic, ecological, and economic aspects of human interactions with our living world. Articles that significantly advance ethnobiological theory and/or methodology are particularly welcome, as well as studies bridging across disciplines and knowledge systems. JoE does not publish uncontextualized data such as species lists; appropriate submissions must elaborate on the ethnobiological context of findings.