Patient and clinician perspectives of ophthalmology emergency attendances during the COVID 19 pandemic.

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Ernest Lim, Mumta Kanda, Zena Rodrigues, Rohan Hussain, Vickie Lee
{"title":"Patient and clinician perspectives of ophthalmology emergency attendances during the COVID 19 pandemic.","authors":"Ernest Lim, Mumta Kanda, Zena Rodrigues, Rohan Hussain, Vickie Lee","doi":"10.1177/20534345221092512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To explore patient and clinician perspectives on acute ophthalmology presentations during the COVID pandemic. To ascertain whether the pandemic had differentially impacted access to care based on patient demographics and postcodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, cross-sectional prospective study in a busy metropolitan eye casualty between April-June 2020 recording patient demographics, distance travelled to access healthcare, diagnosis and outcome compared to the equivalent period in 2019. A further two-part survey was conducted to explore patient and clinician's perceptions around delays in attendances, views on remote consultation and severity of the condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a 68% decrease in April 2020 compared to previous year's ED attendance. The diagnosis tended towards more visually significant pathology. From 2019 to 2020, there was a significant decrease in average distance travelled to the eye emergency department (eye ED). working-age adults (18-59) and white patients travelling from very far pre-pandemic contributed most to this change. 513 Patient responses (12%) out of 4433 attendances during the study period were received, 89% (456/513) of the completed surveys also had matching clinician surveys. 29% (149/513) patients felt COVID-19 stopped them from attending earlier. Clinicians thought a video consultation would have been suitable for 40% (182/456) of patients compared to only 13% (58/456) of patients preferring a video consultation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although our findings were limited by low response rates, COVID-19 may have caused a delay in presentation for emergency eye care. Demographic changes and attitudes towards video consultations have implications for planning of emergency eye care in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345221092512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To explore patient and clinician perspectives on acute ophthalmology presentations during the COVID pandemic. To ascertain whether the pandemic had differentially impacted access to care based on patient demographics and postcodes.

Methods: A single-centre, cross-sectional prospective study in a busy metropolitan eye casualty between April-June 2020 recording patient demographics, distance travelled to access healthcare, diagnosis and outcome compared to the equivalent period in 2019. A further two-part survey was conducted to explore patient and clinician's perceptions around delays in attendances, views on remote consultation and severity of the condition.

Results: There was a 68% decrease in April 2020 compared to previous year's ED attendance. The diagnosis tended towards more visually significant pathology. From 2019 to 2020, there was a significant decrease in average distance travelled to the eye emergency department (eye ED). working-age adults (18-59) and white patients travelling from very far pre-pandemic contributed most to this change. 513 Patient responses (12%) out of 4433 attendances during the study period were received, 89% (456/513) of the completed surveys also had matching clinician surveys. 29% (149/513) patients felt COVID-19 stopped them from attending earlier. Clinicians thought a video consultation would have been suitable for 40% (182/456) of patients compared to only 13% (58/456) of patients preferring a video consultation.

Discussion: Although our findings were limited by low response rates, COVID-19 may have caused a delay in presentation for emergency eye care. Demographic changes and attitudes towards video consultations have implications for planning of emergency eye care in future pandemics.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间眼科急诊就诊的患者和临床医生观点
目的探讨COVID大流行期间患者和临床医生对急性眼科表现的看法。确定大流行是否根据患者人口统计和邮政编码对获得医疗服务的影响有所不同。方法对2020年4月至6月期间繁忙的大都市眼病患者进行单中心横断面前瞻性研究,记录患者人口统计数据、就医距离、诊断和结果,与2019年同期相比。进一步进行了两部分调查,以探讨患者和临床医生对就诊延误的看法,对远程咨询和病情严重程度的看法。结果与去年相比,2020年4月急诊科的出勤率下降了68%。诊断倾向于更有视觉意义的病理。从2019年到2020年,到眼科急诊科(eye ED)的平均路程显著减少。工作年龄的成年人(18-59岁)和从大流行前很远的地方来的白人患者对这一变化贡献最大。在研究期间的4433名出诊患者中,收到了513名患者的回复(12%),89%(456/513)完成的调查也有匹配的临床医生调查。29%(149/513)的患者认为COVID-19阻止了他们更早地就诊。临床医生认为视频会诊适合40%(182/456)的患者,而只有13%(58/456)的患者更喜欢视频会诊。尽管我们的研究结果受到低应答率的限制,但COVID-19可能导致紧急眼科护理的就诊延迟。人口结构的变化和对视频咨询的态度对未来大流行病的紧急眼科护理规划产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信