Theosemiosis: An essay on consilience and the perennial philosophy

IF 1 1区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew L. Kalkman
{"title":"Theosemiosis: An essay on consilience and the perennial philosophy","authors":"Matthew L. Kalkman","doi":"10.12697/sss.2023.51.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can the divide between science and religion be bridged? The current article will present the case for semiotics – and specifically the process of theosemiosis – as that platform of connection. In order to present this argument a key issue that must be tackled is whether there is one underlying function within the category of religion that can be extracted and held accountable in its knowledge claims: what has generally been termed the perennial philosophy. This extracted principle must then be capable of conforming to a broader model of consilience that can contain the knowledge captured in both science and religion. A model that can equally explain the work of Aristotle, Bacon, Galilee, and Einstein as it does Moses, Buddha, Jesus and Krishna, both in an ontological and epistemological sense; and thus a modification and extension of Enlightenment principles in such a way that they can capture the western and eastern notions of that light. In this regard, seeing truly is ‘knowing’.","PeriodicalId":44467,"journal":{"name":"Sign Systems Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Systems Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2023.51.2.10","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can the divide between science and religion be bridged? The current article will present the case for semiotics – and specifically the process of theosemiosis – as that platform of connection. In order to present this argument a key issue that must be tackled is whether there is one underlying function within the category of religion that can be extracted and held accountable in its knowledge claims: what has generally been termed the perennial philosophy. This extracted principle must then be capable of conforming to a broader model of consilience that can contain the knowledge captured in both science and religion. A model that can equally explain the work of Aristotle, Bacon, Galilee, and Einstein as it does Moses, Buddha, Jesus and Krishna, both in an ontological and epistemological sense; and thus a modification and extension of Enlightenment principles in such a way that they can capture the western and eastern notions of that light. In this regard, seeing truly is ‘knowing’.
神智学:一篇关于一致性和永恒哲学的文章
科学和宗教之间的鸿沟可以弥合吗?当前的文章将展示符号学的案例-特别是神学的过程-作为连接的平台。为了提出这一论点,一个必须解决的关键问题是,在宗教的范畴内,是否有一种潜在的功能,可以提取出来,并在其知识主张中承担责任:即通常被称为永恒哲学的东西。这个提取出来的原则必须能够符合一个更广泛的一致性模型,这个模型可以包含从科学和宗教中获得的知识。一个既能在本体论上也能在认识论上解释亚里士多德、培根、加利利和爱因斯坦的著作,也能解释摩西、佛陀、耶稣和奎师那的著作的模型;从而对启蒙运动的原则进行了修改和扩展,这样他们就可以捕捉到西方和东方对那束光的概念。在这方面,看见就是真正的“知道”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sign Systems Studies
Sign Systems Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信