When ‘ideal victim’ meets ‘criminalised other’: Criminal records and the denial of victimisation

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Lauren Bradford-Clarke, Rhiannon Davies, Andrew Henley
{"title":"When ‘ideal victim’ meets ‘criminalised other’: Criminal records and the denial of victimisation","authors":"Lauren Bradford-Clarke, Rhiannon Davies, Andrew Henley","doi":"10.1177/02645505221095068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critically examines the restrictions on access to statutory compensation in Great Britain for victims of serious crime with criminal records. Drawing on original analysis of Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority transparency data it reveals the scale of the denial of victimisation as a so-called ‘collateral consequence of a criminal record’. The policy is then critiqued on the basis that it reproduces the problematic social construction of the ‘ideal victim’, delineates people with criminal records as subaltern citizens and gives rise to harmful secondary victimisation of applicants whose criminal records are often unrelated to their victimisation event.","PeriodicalId":45814,"journal":{"name":"PROBATION JOURNAL","volume":"69 1","pages":"353 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROBATION JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505221095068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article critically examines the restrictions on access to statutory compensation in Great Britain for victims of serious crime with criminal records. Drawing on original analysis of Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority transparency data it reveals the scale of the denial of victimisation as a so-called ‘collateral consequence of a criminal record’. The policy is then critiqued on the basis that it reproduces the problematic social construction of the ‘ideal victim’, delineates people with criminal records as subaltern citizens and gives rise to harmful secondary victimisation of applicants whose criminal records are often unrelated to their victimisation event.
当“理想的受害者”遇到“被定罪的其他人”:犯罪记录和否认受害
本文批判性地考察了英国对有犯罪记录的严重犯罪受害者获得法定赔偿的限制。根据对刑事伤害赔偿管理局透明度数据的原始分析,它揭示了否认受害的规模,即所谓的“犯罪记录附带后果”。然后,该政策受到批评,因为它再现了“理想受害者”的有问题的社会建构,将有犯罪记录的人描绘成次等公民,并导致申请人的有害的二次受害,这些申请人的犯罪记录通常与他们的受害事件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PROBATION JOURNAL
PROBATION JOURNAL CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
26.70%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信