Agency and Constraint in Environmental Policy Coherence

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
K. Blackstock, A. J. Bourke, K. Waylen, K. Marshall
{"title":"Agency and Constraint in Environmental Policy Coherence","authors":"K. Blackstock, A. J. Bourke, K. Waylen, K. Marshall","doi":"10.2458/jpe.3055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether pursuing the breadth of the UN's Sustainable Development Goalsor delivering joined-up approaches within a single environmental domain, it isincreasingly important to understand how policy objectives, policy design andpolicy implementation cohere vertically (within policy) and horizontally(between policies). However, policy coherence remains a challenge to implement.The limited empirical scholarship on policy coherence tends to focus on policydocumentation and/or the outcomes, with little attention to individual agencyor social processes involved. Therefore, our contribution considers theindividuals making policy coherence happen. Furthermore, there is littlediscussion of the normative dimensions of policy coherence making it ripe for apolitical ecology analysis. Empirical research conducted with thoseimplementing policy coherence within four UK catchment (watershed) partnershipsis considered from a critical interpretive policy analysis perspective toenrich the interface between political ecology and environmental policy. We findthat the appetite and ability to support policy coherence depends on individualagency as much as partnership structures. We consider which actors practicepolicy coherence; what motivates those investing their energy into thesecoherence practices; and their constraints. Although it is challenging to researchsuch processes, our data provides insights into the social processes of policycoherence. The explicit political ecology lens highlights how power is involvedin these voluntary initiatives, echoing the critique of traditionalpresentations of integrated water resource management devoid of politics.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.3055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Whether pursuing the breadth of the UN's Sustainable Development Goalsor delivering joined-up approaches within a single environmental domain, it isincreasingly important to understand how policy objectives, policy design andpolicy implementation cohere vertically (within policy) and horizontally(between policies). However, policy coherence remains a challenge to implement.The limited empirical scholarship on policy coherence tends to focus on policydocumentation and/or the outcomes, with little attention to individual agencyor social processes involved. Therefore, our contribution considers theindividuals making policy coherence happen. Furthermore, there is littlediscussion of the normative dimensions of policy coherence making it ripe for apolitical ecology analysis. Empirical research conducted with thoseimplementing policy coherence within four UK catchment (watershed) partnershipsis considered from a critical interpretive policy analysis perspective toenrich the interface between political ecology and environmental policy. We findthat the appetite and ability to support policy coherence depends on individualagency as much as partnership structures. We consider which actors practicepolicy coherence; what motivates those investing their energy into thesecoherence practices; and their constraints. Although it is challenging to researchsuch processes, our data provides insights into the social processes of policycoherence. The explicit political ecology lens highlights how power is involvedin these voluntary initiatives, echoing the critique of traditionalpresentations of integrated water resource management devoid of politics.
环境政策协调中的代理与约束
无论是追求联合国可持续发展目标的广度,还是在一个单一的环境领域内提供联合方法,了解政策目标、政策设计和政策实施如何纵向(政策内)和横向(政策之间)协调一致,都变得越来越重要。然而,政策的一致性仍然是一项需要执行的挑战。关于政策一致性的有限实证研究往往侧重于政策文件和/或结果,很少关注所涉及的个人机构或社会过程。因此,我们的贡献考虑了使政策连贯性发生的个人因素。此外,很少有人讨论政策一致性的规范层面,这使得非政治生态学分析的时机已经成熟。从批判性解释性政策分析的角度考虑,在英国四个流域(流域)合作伙伴关系内实施政策一致性的实证研究,以丰富政治生态学和环境政策之间的界面。我们发现,支持政策一致性的意愿和能力取决于个人机构和伙伴关系结构。我们考虑哪些行动者的实践连贯性;是什么激励那些将精力投入到这些连贯性实践中;以及它们的限制。尽管研究这些过程具有挑战性,但我们的数据为政策一致性的社会过程提供了见解。明确的政治生态学视角突出了权力是如何参与这些自愿倡议的,呼应了对缺乏政治的水资源综合管理传统表现的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信