PROGNOSIS FOR SECONDARY PERITONITIS OUTCOME

Q4 Medicine
N. V. Lebedev, S. B. Agrba, V. Popov, A. Klimov, G. T. Svanadze
{"title":"PROGNOSIS FOR SECONDARY PERITONITIS OUTCOME","authors":"N. V. Lebedev, S. B. Agrba, V. Popov, A. Klimov, G. T. Svanadze","doi":"10.18484/2305-0047.2021.5.558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. To develop a new system for predicting the outcome of secondary peritonitis and analyze its accuracy in comparison with the most common analogous systems. Methods. The study is based on the analysis of treatment results in patients (n=352) with secondary peritonitis. At admission sepsis was diagnosed in 15 (4.3%) patients, septic shock - in 4 (1.1%) persons. There were the following main causes of death in the mortality structure: purulent intoxication and/or sepsis - 51 cases (87.9%), cancer intoxication - 4 (6.9%) cases, acute cardiovascular failure - 3 cases (5.2%). The efficacy of the Mantheim Peritoneal Index (MPI), WSES prognostic score, APACHE-II scale, gSOFA score and Peritonitis Prediction System (PPS) developed by the authors were analyzed. The likelihood of the effect of 85 clinical and laboratory parameters on the outcome of patients with secondary peritonitis using nonparametric methods of statistical research (Fisher’s test, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square with Yates correction) have been analyzed. Criteria predictively associated with lethal outcome (p <0.05) were selected, they were included in the PPS scale. To compare the predictive value of peritonitis prediction systems, ROC analysis was used with the construction of ROC curves for each of the systems. Results. The most important criteria in predicting fatal outcome are the patient’s age, the presence of malignant tumor, the exudate nature, sepsis (septic shock), and also polyorganic insufficiency which is not associated with developed peritonitis. To assess the prognostic value of peritonitis prediction systems, ROC curve analysis was used. The greatest accuracy in terms of predicting mortality in patients with generalized secondary peritonitis is possessed by PPS (AUC 0.942), minimal - APACHEII (AUC 0.840). Conclusion. APACHEII, MPI, WSESSSS and PPS systems can be considered as reliable in predicting mortality in patients with peritonitis. The greatest accuracy in predicting fatal outcome in patients with generalized secondary peritonitis had PPS (94%). What this paper adds An original system for predicting the outcome of peritonitis (PPS) has been developed. It was found that the criteria of the patient’s age, the presence of a malignant neoplasm, the nature of the exudate, sepsis (septic shock), as well as polyorganic insufficiency not associated with the developed peritonitis are of the greatest importance in predicting the death outcome. When conducting a comparative assessment with the most common similar systems (MPI, WSES SSS, APACHE-II), it was found that the most accurate in terms of predicting mortality in a patient with generalized secondary peritonitis is the PPS (AUC 0.942), the minimum - APACHEII (AUC 0.840).","PeriodicalId":38373,"journal":{"name":"Novosti Khirurgii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosti Khirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2021.5.558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To develop a new system for predicting the outcome of secondary peritonitis and analyze its accuracy in comparison with the most common analogous systems. Methods. The study is based on the analysis of treatment results in patients (n=352) with secondary peritonitis. At admission sepsis was diagnosed in 15 (4.3%) patients, septic shock - in 4 (1.1%) persons. There were the following main causes of death in the mortality structure: purulent intoxication and/or sepsis - 51 cases (87.9%), cancer intoxication - 4 (6.9%) cases, acute cardiovascular failure - 3 cases (5.2%). The efficacy of the Mantheim Peritoneal Index (MPI), WSES prognostic score, APACHE-II scale, gSOFA score and Peritonitis Prediction System (PPS) developed by the authors were analyzed. The likelihood of the effect of 85 clinical and laboratory parameters on the outcome of patients with secondary peritonitis using nonparametric methods of statistical research (Fisher’s test, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square with Yates correction) have been analyzed. Criteria predictively associated with lethal outcome (p <0.05) were selected, they were included in the PPS scale. To compare the predictive value of peritonitis prediction systems, ROC analysis was used with the construction of ROC curves for each of the systems. Results. The most important criteria in predicting fatal outcome are the patient’s age, the presence of malignant tumor, the exudate nature, sepsis (septic shock), and also polyorganic insufficiency which is not associated with developed peritonitis. To assess the prognostic value of peritonitis prediction systems, ROC curve analysis was used. The greatest accuracy in terms of predicting mortality in patients with generalized secondary peritonitis is possessed by PPS (AUC 0.942), minimal - APACHEII (AUC 0.840). Conclusion. APACHEII, MPI, WSESSSS and PPS systems can be considered as reliable in predicting mortality in patients with peritonitis. The greatest accuracy in predicting fatal outcome in patients with generalized secondary peritonitis had PPS (94%). What this paper adds An original system for predicting the outcome of peritonitis (PPS) has been developed. It was found that the criteria of the patient’s age, the presence of a malignant neoplasm, the nature of the exudate, sepsis (septic shock), as well as polyorganic insufficiency not associated with the developed peritonitis are of the greatest importance in predicting the death outcome. When conducting a comparative assessment with the most common similar systems (MPI, WSES SSS, APACHE-II), it was found that the most accurate in terms of predicting mortality in a patient with generalized secondary peritonitis is the PPS (AUC 0.942), the minimum - APACHEII (AUC 0.840).
继发性腹膜炎的预后
目标。开发一种新的预测继发性腹膜炎预后的系统,并与最常见的类似系统进行比较,分析其准确性。方法。该研究基于对352例继发性腹膜炎患者治疗结果的分析。15名(4.3%)患者入院时被诊断为败血症,4名(1.1%)患者被诊断为感染性休克。死亡率结构中有以下主要死亡原因:脓性中毒和/或败血症51例(87.9%),癌症中毒4例(6.9%),急性心血管衰竭3例(5.2%),对作者开发的gSOFA评分和腹膜炎预测系统(PPS)进行了分析。使用非参数统计研究方法(Fisher检验、Mann-Whitney检验、Yates校正卡方检验)分析了85个临床和实验室参数对继发性腹膜炎患者预后影响的可能性。选择与致死结果预测相关的标准(p<0.05),并将其纳入PPS量表。为了比较腹膜炎预测系统的预测价值,将ROC分析与每个系统的ROC曲线的构建相结合。后果预测致命结果的最重要标准是患者的年龄、是否存在恶性肿瘤、渗出物性质、败血症(感染性休克)以及与发展性腹膜炎无关的多器官功能不全。为了评估腹膜炎预测系统的预后价值,使用ROC曲线分析。PPS(AUC 0.942)和最小APACHEII(AUC 0.840)在预测全身性继发性腹膜炎患者死亡率方面具有最大的准确性。APACHEII、MPI、WSESSSS和PPS系统可以被认为是预测腹膜炎患者死亡率的可靠系统。预测全身性继发性腹膜炎患者死亡结局的最高准确率为PPS(94%)。本文补充了一个用于预测腹膜炎(PPS)结果的原始系统。研究发现,患者的年龄、恶性肿瘤的存在、渗出物的性质、败血症(感染性休克)以及与发展性腹膜炎无关的多器官功能不全是预测死亡结果的最重要标准。当与最常见的相似系统(MPI、WSES SSS、APACHE-II)进行比较评估时,发现在预测全身性继发性腹膜炎患者死亡率方面,最准确的是PPS(AUC 0.942),即最小的APACHEII(AUC 0.840)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Novosti Khirurgii
Novosti Khirurgii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信