Cognitive status of older adults with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia on Hindi Cognitive Screening Test and Saint Louis University Mental State

R. Tripathi, S. Tripathi, N. Pandey, Anamika Srivastava, K. Usman, W. Ali, S. Tiwari
{"title":"Cognitive status of older adults with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia on Hindi Cognitive Screening Test and Saint Louis University Mental State","authors":"R. Tripathi, S. Tripathi, N. Pandey, Anamika Srivastava, K. Usman, W. Ali, S. Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/jgmh.jgmh_43_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hindi cognitive screening test (HCST) and Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination both claim that they are bias-free cognitive screening tests. HCST is highly sensitive and specific in screening Indian older adults. However, SLUMS is more comprehensive in terms of assessing visuospatial and memory functions. The present study presents and compare cognitive status of older adults with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), and dyslipidemia (DL) on HCST and SLUMS. Methods: The sample comprised of 150 older adults ≥60 years included in a consecutive series. Participants and their family members, giving written informed consent, residing permanently in central catchment areas Chowk, Lucknow, constituted the study sample. Semistructured sociodemographic details and medical history proforma, Socioeconomic Status (SES) Scale, General Health Questionaire – 12, SLUMS and HCST were administered. Blood pressure was measured by Medical Research Assistant. Biochemical investigations for DM and DL were carried out. Participants were categorized into two groups: (1) case groups (112): DM only + HT only + DL only and (2) control group (38): Without discernable abnormality of physical illness on the basis of invesigations. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard devitation SD, Chi-square, and t-test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference on cognitive status between control and DM group on recall, reading, copying (P < 0.05 level), and on writing (P < 0.01) on HCST. A statistically significant difference was also found in writing (P < 0.01) between control and HT group. A statistically significant difference was found between control and DL on recall (P < 0.05) and writing (P < 0.01). According to SLUMS control and DM group differ significantly (0.01) for delayed recall and with HT and DL group on visuospatial function. Conclusion: Cognitive status of older adults with DM, HT, and DL was found to be significantly impaired on specific domains as compared to the control group.","PeriodicalId":16009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Mental Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"118 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgmh.jgmh_43_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hindi cognitive screening test (HCST) and Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination both claim that they are bias-free cognitive screening tests. HCST is highly sensitive and specific in screening Indian older adults. However, SLUMS is more comprehensive in terms of assessing visuospatial and memory functions. The present study presents and compare cognitive status of older adults with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), and dyslipidemia (DL) on HCST and SLUMS. Methods: The sample comprised of 150 older adults ≥60 years included in a consecutive series. Participants and their family members, giving written informed consent, residing permanently in central catchment areas Chowk, Lucknow, constituted the study sample. Semistructured sociodemographic details and medical history proforma, Socioeconomic Status (SES) Scale, General Health Questionaire – 12, SLUMS and HCST were administered. Blood pressure was measured by Medical Research Assistant. Biochemical investigations for DM and DL were carried out. Participants were categorized into two groups: (1) case groups (112): DM only + HT only + DL only and (2) control group (38): Without discernable abnormality of physical illness on the basis of invesigations. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard devitation SD, Chi-square, and t-test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference on cognitive status between control and DM group on recall, reading, copying (P < 0.05 level), and on writing (P < 0.01) on HCST. A statistically significant difference was also found in writing (P < 0.01) between control and HT group. A statistically significant difference was found between control and DL on recall (P < 0.05) and writing (P < 0.01). According to SLUMS control and DM group differ significantly (0.01) for delayed recall and with HT and DL group on visuospatial function. Conclusion: Cognitive status of older adults with DM, HT, and DL was found to be significantly impaired on specific domains as compared to the control group.
印地语认知筛查测试和圣路易斯大学精神状态对患有糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常的老年人的认知状况
背景:印地语认知筛选测试(HCST)和圣路易斯大学精神状态(贫民窟)检查都声称他们是无偏见的认知筛选测试。HCST在筛查印度老年人方面具有高度敏感性和特异性。然而,贫民窟在评估视觉空间和记忆功能方面更为全面。本研究介绍并比较老年糖尿病(DM)、高血压(HT)和血脂异常(DL)患者在HCST和贫民窟的认知状况。方法:样本由150名≥60岁的老年人组成。研究样本为长期居住在勒克瑙中部集水区Chowk的参与者及其家庭成员,并给予书面知情同意。采用半结构化的社会人口学详细资料和病史形式、社会经济地位量表、一般健康问卷- 12、贫民窟和HCST。血压由医学研究助理测量。进行了DM和DL的生化检测。参与者被分为两组:(1)病例组(112):仅DM + HT + DL;(2)对照组(38):根据调查,没有可识别的身体疾病异常。数据分析采用百分比、平均值、标准差SD、卡方和t检验。结果:对照组与DM组在HCST的回忆、阅读、临摹和写作方面的认知状态差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在书写方面,对照组与HT组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。对照组与深度学习组在召回率(P < 0.05)和写作率(P < 0.01)上差异有统计学意义。在延迟回忆功能上,贫民窟对照组与糖尿病组有显著差异(0.01),在视觉空间功能上与糖尿病组有显著差异(0.01)。结论:与对照组相比,老年DM、HT和DL患者的认知状态在特定领域明显受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信