Comments on Revisiting Complementarity between Japanese FDI and the Import of Intermediate Goods: Agglomeration Effects and Parent-firm Heterogeneity

IF 5.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tadashi Ito, Toshiyuki Matsuura, Chih‐hai Yang, A. Obashi, Kozo Kiyota
{"title":"Comments on Revisiting Complementarity between Japanese FDI and the Import of Intermediate Goods: Agglomeration Effects and Parent-firm Heterogeneity","authors":"Tadashi Ito, Toshiyuki Matsuura, Chih‐hai Yang, A. Obashi, Kozo Kiyota","doi":"10.1162/asep_a_00791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the contributions of this paper is the creation of unique panel data by combining Chinese Custom Trade data, China’s An-nual Survey of Industrial Firms, Toyo Keizai’s Overseas Japanese Companies, and Tokyo Stock Research data by identifying both parent and affiliated firms for seven years from 2000 to 2006. Adopting a discrete-time hazard model used by Hess and Persson (2012), the authors lead to a conclusion that firms in agglomerated regions with more foreign affiliates shorten its duration, while small and medium-sized (SME) firms import for a longer duration. My first comment is on the use of Toyo Keizai’s Overseas Japanese Companies. These data provide the year of establishment of the FDI company. However, the paper does not use this establishment year data for further analysis. The behavior of FDI companies can de-pend on the year of establishment year, especially with regard to survival analysis. The behavior of FDI companies founded in 1990 and in 2000 must be different. My second comment is the period coverage. There is similar survival analysis for FDI and trade nexus that addresses much longer periods. For example, Clausing (2000) used data for 18 years from 1977 to 1994, and Head and Ries (2001) used 25 years of data from 1966 to 1990. This paper uses a much shorter period—seven years from 2000 to 2006. Is this period setting long enough to assert that this conclusion is valid? In addition, it focuses on the negative sign of coefficients of important explanatory variables such as Diff, Upstream, Process , and Exports , and the positive signs of variables such as Alabor, KL-ratio, Agg-local-r , and Plarge . It may be more informative to include in the analysis things such as how many years it takes to reduce 50 percent or 80 percent reduction of intermediate imports. Nevertheless, this paper creates fine, rich parent-affiliate panel data derived from four dif-ferent databases. The framework of analysis is compact and","PeriodicalId":52020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Papers","volume":"19 1","pages":"109-110"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the contributions of this paper is the creation of unique panel data by combining Chinese Custom Trade data, China’s An-nual Survey of Industrial Firms, Toyo Keizai’s Overseas Japanese Companies, and Tokyo Stock Research data by identifying both parent and affiliated firms for seven years from 2000 to 2006. Adopting a discrete-time hazard model used by Hess and Persson (2012), the authors lead to a conclusion that firms in agglomerated regions with more foreign affiliates shorten its duration, while small and medium-sized (SME) firms import for a longer duration. My first comment is on the use of Toyo Keizai’s Overseas Japanese Companies. These data provide the year of establishment of the FDI company. However, the paper does not use this establishment year data for further analysis. The behavior of FDI companies can de-pend on the year of establishment year, especially with regard to survival analysis. The behavior of FDI companies founded in 1990 and in 2000 must be different. My second comment is the period coverage. There is similar survival analysis for FDI and trade nexus that addresses much longer periods. For example, Clausing (2000) used data for 18 years from 1977 to 1994, and Head and Ries (2001) used 25 years of data from 1966 to 1990. This paper uses a much shorter period—seven years from 2000 to 2006. Is this period setting long enough to assert that this conclusion is valid? In addition, it focuses on the negative sign of coefficients of important explanatory variables such as Diff, Upstream, Process , and Exports , and the positive signs of variables such as Alabor, KL-ratio, Agg-local-r , and Plarge . It may be more informative to include in the analysis things such as how many years it takes to reduce 50 percent or 80 percent reduction of intermediate imports. Nevertheless, this paper creates fine, rich parent-affiliate panel data derived from four dif-ferent databases. The framework of analysis is compact and
日本FDI与中间产品进口互补性研究述评:集聚效应与母公司异质性
本文的贡献之一是将中国海关贸易数据、中国工业企业年度调查数据、东京都经济研究所的海外日本公司数据和东京股票研究数据结合起来,通过识别2000年至2006年7年的母公司和关联公司,创建了独特的面板数据。采用Hess和Persson(2012)使用的离散时间风险模型,作者得出结论,在拥有更多外国分支机构的集聚地区,企业的进口持续时间缩短,而中小企业的进口持续时间更长。我的第一个评论是关于使用东洋经济的海外日本公司。这些数据提供了外商直接投资公司的成立年份。然而,本文没有使用该成立年的数据进行进一步分析。外国直接投资公司的行为可能取决于成立年份,特别是在生存分析方面。1990年和2000年成立的FDI企业的行为必然不同。我的第二个评论是期间的报道。对外国直接投资和贸易关系也有类似的生存分析,但涉及的时间要长得多。例如,Clausing(2000)使用了1977年至1994年18年的数据,Head和Ries(2001)使用了1966年至1990年25年的数据。本文使用的时间要短得多——从2000年到2006年的7年。这个周期是否足够长,足以断言这个结论是有效的?此外,重点关注Diff、Upstream、Process、Exports等重要解释变量系数的负号,以及Alabor、KL-ratio、Agg-local-r、Plarge等变量系数的正号。在分析中包含诸如需要多少年才能将中间产品进口减少50%或80%这样的内容,可能会提供更多信息。尽管如此,本文还是从四个不同的数据库中创建了精细、丰富的亲子关系面板数据。分析的框架是紧凑的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The journal Asian Economic Papers (AEP) is supported by several prominent institutions, including the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University in the United States. This shows that there is a strong emphasis on sustainable development within the journal's scope. Additionally, the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy in South Korea, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) in Malaysia, and the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia in Indonesia also sponsor AEP. The articles published in AEP focus on conducting thorough and rigorous analyses of significant economic issues pertaining to specific Asian economies or the broader Asian region. The aim is to gain a deeper understanding of these issues and provide innovative solutions. By offering creative solutions to economic challenges, AEP contributes to the discourse and policymaking that impact the Asian economies and region as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信