Water Scavenging from Roadside Springs in Appalachia

IF 0.9 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Leigh-Anne Krometis, Hannah Patton, Austin Wozniak, Emily Sarver
{"title":"Water Scavenging from Roadside Springs in Appalachia","authors":"Leigh-Anne Krometis,&nbsp;Hannah Patton,&nbsp;Austin Wozniak,&nbsp;Emily Sarver","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-704X.2019.03301.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Significant challenges in the provision of safe drinking water and appropriate, effective sanitation remain in the United States, particularly among communities with few financial resources and/or situated in challenging terrain. Though previous formal research is limited, anecdotal reports suggest that some households in Appalachia may rely on untreated, unregulated roadside “springs” as a primary source of potable water. This effort monitored the water quality at twenty-one of these springs in Central Appalachia and identified potential motivations for this behavior through volunteer surveys in order to better define community challenges and to establish communication for future outreach. The majority (&gt;80%) of spring samples collected were positive for <i>E. coli</i>, indicating a potential risk of exposure to waterborne pathogens; measured concentrations of metals and nutrients were generally in accordance with USEPA recommendations for drinking water. Survey respondents generally had a piped source of in-home water available yet primarily collected the water due to “taste” and “quality/health” and used it directly for drinking. Multiple respondents included extra written information indicating that they either did not trust their in-home water source or considered it unreliable. Collectively these results suggest that these roadside springs do serve as a regular source of household water for some communities though they generally do not meet federal drinking water standards. Future efforts are encouraged to work with local municipal water authorities to rebuild community trust and/or to determine whether on-site treatment at these springs is practicable.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2019.03301.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2019.03301.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Significant challenges in the provision of safe drinking water and appropriate, effective sanitation remain in the United States, particularly among communities with few financial resources and/or situated in challenging terrain. Though previous formal research is limited, anecdotal reports suggest that some households in Appalachia may rely on untreated, unregulated roadside “springs” as a primary source of potable water. This effort monitored the water quality at twenty-one of these springs in Central Appalachia and identified potential motivations for this behavior through volunteer surveys in order to better define community challenges and to establish communication for future outreach. The majority (>80%) of spring samples collected were positive for E. coli, indicating a potential risk of exposure to waterborne pathogens; measured concentrations of metals and nutrients were generally in accordance with USEPA recommendations for drinking water. Survey respondents generally had a piped source of in-home water available yet primarily collected the water due to “taste” and “quality/health” and used it directly for drinking. Multiple respondents included extra written information indicating that they either did not trust their in-home water source or considered it unreliable. Collectively these results suggest that these roadside springs do serve as a regular source of household water for some communities though they generally do not meet federal drinking water standards. Future efforts are encouraged to work with local municipal water authorities to rebuild community trust and/or to determine whether on-site treatment at these springs is practicable.

Abstract Image

从阿巴拉契亚的路边泉水中取水
在提供安全饮用水和适当、有效的卫生设施方面,美国仍然面临重大挑战,特别是在缺乏财政资源和/或处于困难地形的社区。尽管之前的正式研究有限,但坊间报道表明,阿巴拉契亚地区的一些家庭可能依赖未经处理、不受管制的路边“泉水”作为饮用水的主要来源。这项工作监测了阿巴拉契亚中部21个泉水的水质,并通过志愿者调查确定了这种行为的潜在动机,以便更好地定义社区挑战,并为未来的推广建立沟通。大多数(约80%)采集的春季样本大肠杆菌呈阳性,表明存在接触水传播病原体的潜在风险;测得的金属和营养物质浓度总体上符合美国环保署对饮用水的建议。调查对象一般都有家庭用水的管道来源,但主要是出于“味道”和“质量/健康”的考虑收集水,并直接用于饮用。许多受访者提供了额外的书面信息,表明他们要么不相信家里的水源,要么认为它不可靠。总的来说,这些结果表明,这些路边的泉水确实是一些社区家庭用水的常规来源,尽管它们通常不符合联邦饮用水标准。鼓励今后努力与当地市政供水当局合作,重建社区信任和/或确定在这些泉水进行现场处理是否可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信