Artificial Intelligence and Résumé Critique Experiences

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
David W. Drewery, J. Woodside, Kristen Eppel
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Résumé Critique Experiences","authors":"David W. Drewery, J. Woodside, Kristen Eppel","doi":"10.53379/cjcd.2022.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where résumés are concerned, student supports tend to include tactical feedback that addresses issues in students’ writing and strategic feedback aimed at coaching critical self-reflection. However, there is not always time to cover all that could be offered by both kinds of feedback in a single résumé critique. Given demands on staff time, many career services administrators are considering opportunities to leverage artificial intelligence-based (AI) products that might offer tactical feedback and allow staff to focus on offering strategic feedback. In a field experiment, we explored how novice job seekers’ use of an AI-based résumé critique product influenced their subsequent face-to-face résumé critique experiences, especially the kinds of feedback offered and learning outcomes that resulted from this. As expected, the AI offered substantial tactical feedback and less strategic feedback. Students’ use of the AI did not result in greater opportunity for strategic feedback and associated learning outcomes. Rather, the AI rendered issues in students’ writing more salient. In turn, this invited more attention to tactical aspects and less attention to strategic aspects of students’ résumés. ","PeriodicalId":41626,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Career Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53379/cjcd.2022.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where résumés are concerned, student supports tend to include tactical feedback that addresses issues in students’ writing and strategic feedback aimed at coaching critical self-reflection. However, there is not always time to cover all that could be offered by both kinds of feedback in a single résumé critique. Given demands on staff time, many career services administrators are considering opportunities to leverage artificial intelligence-based (AI) products that might offer tactical feedback and allow staff to focus on offering strategic feedback. In a field experiment, we explored how novice job seekers’ use of an AI-based résumé critique product influenced their subsequent face-to-face résumé critique experiences, especially the kinds of feedback offered and learning outcomes that resulted from this. As expected, the AI offered substantial tactical feedback and less strategic feedback. Students’ use of the AI did not result in greater opportunity for strategic feedback and associated learning outcomes. Rather, the AI rendered issues in students’ writing more salient. In turn, this invited more attention to tactical aspects and less attention to strategic aspects of students’ résumés. 
人工智能和rsamsum评论经验
在涉及到rsamsumims的情况下,学生的支持倾向于包括解决学生写作问题的战术反馈和旨在指导批判性自我反思的战略反馈。然而,我们并不总是有足够的时间在一篇简单的评论中涵盖这两种反馈所能提供的所有内容。鉴于对员工时间的需求,许多职业服务管理员正在考虑利用基于人工智能(AI)的产品,这些产品可能提供战术反馈,并允许员工专注于提供战略反馈。在一项实地实验中,我们探索了新手求职者使用基于人工智能的薪酬评估产品如何影响他们随后面对面的薪酬评估经历,尤其是所提供的反馈和由此产生的学习成果。正如预期的那样,AI提供了大量的战术反馈和较少的战略反馈。学生使用人工智能并没有带来更多的战略反馈和相关学习成果的机会。相反,人工智能使学生写作中的问题更加突出。反过来,这引起了更多的关注战术方面和较少的关注战略方面的学生的履历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信