What Participation Means in Marine Spatial Planning Systems? Lessons from the French Case

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2022-01-23 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2022.2027638

L. Tissière, B. Trouillet

引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is already a substantial body of literature examining the participation issues in Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). This paper addresses these issues in the French MSP process. Using qualitative materials, it examines the participation process from four perspectives: structural, contextual, organisational, methodological. It shows that public participation in the French MSP system is still mostly procedural. Also, in most other EU countries, participation is used as a tool for resolving conflicts about use of the sea as well as to build acceptability for marine renewable energy projects. Whatever the role participation plays, it requires a critical attention in MSP processes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

参与海洋空间规划系统意味着什么?法国案例的教训

已经有大量的文献研究了海洋空间规划(MSP)中的参与问题。本文讨论了法国MSP进程中的这些问题。使用定性材料，它从四个角度考察参与过程:结构，背景，组织，方法。这表明，公众对法国MSP体系的参与仍主要是程序性的。此外，在大多数其他欧盟国家，参与被用作解决有关海洋利用的冲突的工具，并为海洋可再生能源项目建立可接受性。无论参与扮演什么角色，它都需要在MSP过程中得到关键的关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

18.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice