Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of methyldopa and labetalol in pregnancy-induced hypertension: A meta-analysis

R. Patel, R. Shah, D. Lad, D. Rana, S. Malhotra
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of methyldopa and labetalol in pregnancy-induced hypertension: A meta-analysis","authors":"R. Patel, R. Shah, D. Lad, D. Rana, S. Malhotra","doi":"10.4103/tjog.tjog_87_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Methyldopa and labetalol are the drugs that frequently used for the management of pregnancy-induced hypertension. But fewer data available for the efficacy and safety of their use. So, here we are doing a systemic review for the safety and efficacy of methyldopa in comparison to labetalol. Objectives: Assessment of efficacy and safety of methyldopa versus labetalol in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Method: A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines (2015) and have included pregnant women who developed hypertension after the 20th week of gestation and receiving methyldopa (100–400 mg/day) or labetalol (250–1000 mg/day). All RCTs with changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) before and after drug administration was collected. The adverse effects of the respective drugs were also noted. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the calculation of standardized mean difference (SMD). P value less than 0.05 will be considered significant. Result: Data of 1,200 patients were included in our study. Both the drug decreases MAP statistically significantly. In the labetalol group, P value was statistically significant (random effect model P < 0.005 and in the fixed-effect model <0.001). In methyldopa group, P < 0.001, significant in fixed effect. In the majority of the studies, the difference in the reduction of MAP was higher in labetalol than methyldopa. In labetalol vs methyldopa study using random-effect model SMD was 1.568 (95% CI, 0.735 to 2.401, P < 0.001). Drowsiness, headache, nausea, vomiting, weakness, and myalgia were associated with drugs. Out of the six adverse effects, there was a significant difference found in drowsiness (P = 0.023) which was seen more in patients receiving methyldopa. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of the other maternal side effects. Conclusions: Labetalol is more efficacious and safer as compared to methyldopa.","PeriodicalId":23302,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjog.tjog_87_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Methyldopa and labetalol are the drugs that frequently used for the management of pregnancy-induced hypertension. But fewer data available for the efficacy and safety of their use. So, here we are doing a systemic review for the safety and efficacy of methyldopa in comparison to labetalol. Objectives: Assessment of efficacy and safety of methyldopa versus labetalol in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Method: A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines (2015) and have included pregnant women who developed hypertension after the 20th week of gestation and receiving methyldopa (100–400 mg/day) or labetalol (250–1000 mg/day). All RCTs with changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) before and after drug administration was collected. The adverse effects of the respective drugs were also noted. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the calculation of standardized mean difference (SMD). P value less than 0.05 will be considered significant. Result: Data of 1,200 patients were included in our study. Both the drug decreases MAP statistically significantly. In the labetalol group, P value was statistically significant (random effect model P < 0.005 and in the fixed-effect model <0.001). In methyldopa group, P < 0.001, significant in fixed effect. In the majority of the studies, the difference in the reduction of MAP was higher in labetalol than methyldopa. In labetalol vs methyldopa study using random-effect model SMD was 1.568 (95% CI, 0.735 to 2.401, P < 0.001). Drowsiness, headache, nausea, vomiting, weakness, and myalgia were associated with drugs. Out of the six adverse effects, there was a significant difference found in drowsiness (P = 0.023) which was seen more in patients receiving methyldopa. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of the other maternal side effects. Conclusions: Labetalol is more efficacious and safer as compared to methyldopa.
甲基多巴和拉贝他洛尔治疗妊娠高血压的疗效和安全性比较:meta分析
引言:甲基多巴和拉贝洛尔是治疗妊娠期高血压的常用药物。但关于其使用的有效性和安全性的可用数据较少。因此,我们正在对甲基多巴与拉贝洛尔的安全性和有效性进行系统评价。目的:评估甲基多巴与拉贝洛尔治疗妊娠期高血压的疗效和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA指南(2015),共进行了10项随机对照试验(RCT),其中包括妊娠20周后出现高血压并接受甲基多巴(100–400 mg/天)或拉贝洛尔(250–1000 mg/日)治疗的孕妇。收集给药前后平均动脉压(MAP)变化的所有随机对照试验。还注意到了各自药物的不良反应。RevMan 5.3软件用于计算标准化平均差(SMD)。P值小于0.05将被认为是显著的。结果:我们的研究包括1200名患者的数据。两种药物均显著降低MAP。拉贝洛尔组的P值具有统计学意义(随机效应模型P<0.005,固定效应模型P>0.001),甲基多巴组P<0.001,固定效应显著。在大多数研究中,拉贝洛尔降低MAP的差异高于甲基多巴。在使用随机效应模型的拉贝洛尔与甲基多巴的研究中,SMD为1.568(95%CI,0.735-2.401,P<0.001)。嗜睡、头痛、恶心、呕吐、虚弱和肌痛与药物有关。在六种不良反应中,嗜睡有显著差异(P=0.023),在接受甲基多巴治疗的患者中更为明显。其他母体副作用的发生率没有显著差异。结论:与甲基多巴相比,拉贝洛尔更有效、更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信