Possibilities and limits of procedural and distributive justice in complex conflicts: a study of the Colombian peace process

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Margarita Canal A., P. Kesting, David Aponte Castro, R. Smolinski
{"title":"Possibilities and limits of procedural and distributive justice in complex conflicts: a study of the Colombian peace process","authors":"Margarita Canal A., P. Kesting, David Aponte Castro, R. Smolinski","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-12-2022-0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nExtensive empirical evidence suggests that procedural justice (PJ) and distributive justice (DJ) are key success factors for achieving durable peace negotiations. This paper aims to investigate how complexity affects these factors and the outcomes in negotiations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe qualitative study is based on an examination of the peace negotiations that led to the 2016 agreement between the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo and the Colombian Government. Based on document analysis, the authors examined in detail how and where in the process the principles of PJ and DJ were applied. The authors then examined the implementation progress after 2016 and placed the peace process in the overall context of the Colombian conflict.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that the principles of PJ and DJ were present in both the negotiation process and the agreement. The negotiations were successful and satisfactory solutions could be found for all issues. The complexity of the conflict is reflected in the limited coverage of the peace negotiations. Not all groups, interests and subconflicts could be included in the negotiations. This limits their contribution to a durable peace in Colombia. Conflicts that remain unresolved also have a negative effect on the implementation of the agreement.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor conflict management, this implies that the negotiations should not be viewed as “one-and-done” but rather as a progressive, ongoing process. The agreement is only the nucleus for achieving total peace. It must be actively advanced and defended.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study offers new qualitative insights into how PJ and DJ function in negotiations. It also establishes a systematic connection between PJ and DJ and complexity, introduces the notion of coverage and, thereby, opens a new perspective on the management of conflict complexity.\n","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-12-2022-0217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Extensive empirical evidence suggests that procedural justice (PJ) and distributive justice (DJ) are key success factors for achieving durable peace negotiations. This paper aims to investigate how complexity affects these factors and the outcomes in negotiations. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative study is based on an examination of the peace negotiations that led to the 2016 agreement between the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo and the Colombian Government. Based on document analysis, the authors examined in detail how and where in the process the principles of PJ and DJ were applied. The authors then examined the implementation progress after 2016 and placed the peace process in the overall context of the Colombian conflict. Findings The authors found that the principles of PJ and DJ were present in both the negotiation process and the agreement. The negotiations were successful and satisfactory solutions could be found for all issues. The complexity of the conflict is reflected in the limited coverage of the peace negotiations. Not all groups, interests and subconflicts could be included in the negotiations. This limits their contribution to a durable peace in Colombia. Conflicts that remain unresolved also have a negative effect on the implementation of the agreement. Practical implications For conflict management, this implies that the negotiations should not be viewed as “one-and-done” but rather as a progressive, ongoing process. The agreement is only the nucleus for achieving total peace. It must be actively advanced and defended. Originality/value This study offers new qualitative insights into how PJ and DJ function in negotiations. It also establishes a systematic connection between PJ and DJ and complexity, introduces the notion of coverage and, thereby, opens a new perspective on the management of conflict complexity.
复杂冲突中程序正义和分配正义的可能性和限制:哥伦比亚和平进程研究
广泛的经验证据表明,程序正义和分配正义是实现持久和平谈判的关键成功因素。本文旨在研究复杂性如何影响这些因素以及谈判的结果。设计/方法/方法定性研究基于对2016年哥伦比亚革命军与哥伦比亚政府之间达成协议的和平谈判的审查。在文献分析的基础上,作者详细研究了PJ和DJ原则在这个过程中是如何以及在哪里应用的。作者随后审查了2016年后的执行进展,并将和平进程置于哥伦比亚冲突的总体背景下。发现PJ和DJ原则在谈判过程和协议中都存在。谈判取得了成功,所有问题都能找到令人满意的解决办法。冲突的复杂性体现在对和平谈判的报道有限。并非所有群体、利益和次冲突都能被纳入谈判。这限制了他们对哥伦比亚持久和平的贡献。尚未解决的冲突也对协议的执行产生负面影响。实际含义对于冲突管理而言,这意味着不应将谈判视为“一次就完成”,而应将其视为一个渐进的、持续的过程。该协议只是实现全面和平的核心。必须积极推进和捍卫它。独创性/价值这项研究为PJ和DJ在谈判中的作用提供了新的定性见解。它还建立了PJ和DJ与复杂性之间的系统联系,引入了覆盖率的概念,从而为冲突复杂性的管理开辟了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信