Reliability of CBCT Dataset in Determination of Surgical Approaches of Maxillary Impacted Canine Teeth

Huner Hussein Rasheed, Nazar Hama Amin
{"title":"Reliability of CBCT Dataset in Determination of Surgical Approaches of Maxillary Impacted Canine Teeth","authors":"Huner Hussein Rasheed, Nazar Hama Amin","doi":"10.24271/psr.2022.356606.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : One of the most commonly impacted teeth is the maxillary canine, right after the third molar. Many potential difficulties might arise before, during, and after the extraction of impacted maxillary teeth. Performing thorough radiographic exams can be beneficial. The information needed for a two-dimensional (2D) examination is provided by the periapical and panoramic radiographs (OPG) utilized in conventional dental radiography. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a novel imaging technology developed in response to the shortcomings of traditional (2-D) imaging methods. Everyone will gain from these problems being resolved. Objectives : This study aims to evaluate two types of 2D (OPG) and 3D imaging (CBCT) approaches for diagnosing and treating maxillary impacted canines. Furthermore, to determine the best approach selection option for surgical removal procedures utilizing OPG and CBCT, focusing on the sagittal section for increased safety and efficiency. Materials and Methods: This study is a prospective radiographic investigation of 80 patients with CBCT radiographic evaluation. Eighteen cases (22.5%) of men and 62 (77.5%) of women were reported. Version 27 of SPSS was used to analyze the data. The independent t-test offered information on the reliability of the quantitative variables. We utilized a Chi-square test for the qualitative analysis, and for the quantitative analysis, we used a cross-tabulation to determine the level of agreement. Results : The t-test result, depending on surgical approach time, was 8.4; there is a significant difference between the two radiography prognoses, with p-values of (0.000) at the significant level (0.05). The % age of agreement between impactions and surgical techniques ranged from 87.5% to 100%. Conclusion : This study shows that the CBCT guide can provide accurate, reliable, and reproducible results in assessing and predicting the kind of impaction and surgical approach in a simple, time-saving manner. © 2022 Production by the University of Garmian. This is an open access article under the LICENSE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/","PeriodicalId":33835,"journal":{"name":"Passer Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24271/psr.2022.356606.1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : One of the most commonly impacted teeth is the maxillary canine, right after the third molar. Many potential difficulties might arise before, during, and after the extraction of impacted maxillary teeth. Performing thorough radiographic exams can be beneficial. The information needed for a two-dimensional (2D) examination is provided by the periapical and panoramic radiographs (OPG) utilized in conventional dental radiography. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a novel imaging technology developed in response to the shortcomings of traditional (2-D) imaging methods. Everyone will gain from these problems being resolved. Objectives : This study aims to evaluate two types of 2D (OPG) and 3D imaging (CBCT) approaches for diagnosing and treating maxillary impacted canines. Furthermore, to determine the best approach selection option for surgical removal procedures utilizing OPG and CBCT, focusing on the sagittal section for increased safety and efficiency. Materials and Methods: This study is a prospective radiographic investigation of 80 patients with CBCT radiographic evaluation. Eighteen cases (22.5%) of men and 62 (77.5%) of women were reported. Version 27 of SPSS was used to analyze the data. The independent t-test offered information on the reliability of the quantitative variables. We utilized a Chi-square test for the qualitative analysis, and for the quantitative analysis, we used a cross-tabulation to determine the level of agreement. Results : The t-test result, depending on surgical approach time, was 8.4; there is a significant difference between the two radiography prognoses, with p-values of (0.000) at the significant level (0.05). The % age of agreement between impactions and surgical techniques ranged from 87.5% to 100%. Conclusion : This study shows that the CBCT guide can provide accurate, reliable, and reproducible results in assessing and predicting the kind of impaction and surgical approach in a simple, time-saving manner. © 2022 Production by the University of Garmian. This is an open access article under the LICENSE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CBCT数据集在确定上颌阻生犬牙手术入路中的可靠性
背景:最常见的阻生牙之一是上颌尖牙,位于第三磨牙之后。在上颌阻生牙拔除之前、期间和之后,可能会出现许多潜在的困难。进行彻底的射线照相检查可能是有益的。二维(2D)检查所需的信息由传统牙科射线照相中使用的根尖周和全景射线照相(OPG)提供。锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是针对传统二维成像方法的不足而开发的一种新型成像技术。每个人都将从这些问题的解决中获益。目的:本研究旨在评估两种类型的二维(OPG)和三维成像(CBCT)方法用于诊断和治疗上颌阻生犬科动物。此外,为了确定利用OPG和CBCT进行外科切除手术的最佳入路选择,重点关注矢状切面,以提高安全性和效率。材料和方法:本研究是对80例患者进行CBCT影像学评估的前瞻性影像学调查。男性18例(22.5%),女性62例(77.5%)。数据分析采用SPSS第27版软件。独立t检验提供了有关定量变量可靠性的信息。我们使用卡方检验进行定性分析,而对于定量分析,我们使用交叉表来确定一致性水平。结果:根据手术入路时间的不同,t检验结果为8.4;两种放射学预测之间存在显著差异,p值(0.000)处于显著水平(0.05)。影响与手术技术之间的一致性%年龄在87.5%-100%之间。结论:本研究表明,CBCT指南可以以简单、省时的方式为评估和预测嵌塞类型和手术方法提供准确、可靠和可重复的结果。©2022 Garmian大学出品。这是许可证下的开放访问文章https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信