Lombalgia crônica em pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico: prevalência e preditores da força muscular de extensão de tronco e sua correlação com a incapacidade

Q Medicine
Raíssa Sudré Cezarino , Jefferson Rosa Cardoso , Kedma Neves Rodrigues , Yasmin Santana Magalhães , Talita Yokoy de Souza , Lícia Maria Henrique da Mota , Ana Clara Bonini‐Rocha , Joseph McVeigh , Wagner Rodrigues Martins
{"title":"Lombalgia crônica em pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico: prevalência e preditores da força muscular de extensão de tronco e sua correlação com a incapacidade","authors":"Raíssa Sudré Cezarino ,&nbsp;Jefferson Rosa Cardoso ,&nbsp;Kedma Neves Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Yasmin Santana Magalhães ,&nbsp;Talita Yokoy de Souza ,&nbsp;Lícia Maria Henrique da Mota ,&nbsp;Ana Clara Bonini‐Rocha ,&nbsp;Joseph McVeigh ,&nbsp;Wagner Rodrigues Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and predictors of Back Muscle Strength (BMS) in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (LES).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross‐sectional study. Ninety‐six ambulatory patients with LES were selected by non‐probability sampling and interviewed and tested during medical consultation. The outcomes measurements were: Point prevalence of CLBP, Oswestry Disability Index, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Fatigue Severity Scale and maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of handgrip and of the back muscles. Correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression were used in statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 96 individuals interviewed, 25 had CLBP, indicating a point prevalence of 26% (92% women). The correlation between the Oswestry Index and maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the back muscles was <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->‐0.4, 95% CI [‐0.68;‐0.01] and between the MVIC of handgrip and of the back muscles was <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.72, 95% CI [0.51;0.88]. The regression model presented the highest value of R<sup>2</sup> being observed when MVIC of the back muscles was tested with five independent variables (63%). In this model handgrip strength was the only predictive variable (ß<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.61, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The prevalence of CLBP in individuals with LES was 26%. The MVIC of the back muscles was 63% predicted by five variables of interest, however, only the handgrip strength was a statistically significant predictive variable. The MVIC of the back muscles presented a linear relation directly proportional to handgrip and inversely proportional to Oswestry Index i.e. stronger back muscles are associated with lower disability scores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2017.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500417300530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

To determine the prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and predictors of Back Muscle Strength (BMS) in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (LES).

Methods

Cross‐sectional study. Ninety‐six ambulatory patients with LES were selected by non‐probability sampling and interviewed and tested during medical consultation. The outcomes measurements were: Point prevalence of CLBP, Oswestry Disability Index, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Fatigue Severity Scale and maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of handgrip and of the back muscles. Correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression were used in statistical analysis.

Results

Of the 96 individuals interviewed, 25 had CLBP, indicating a point prevalence of 26% (92% women). The correlation between the Oswestry Index and maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the back muscles was r = ‐0.4, 95% CI [‐0.68;‐0.01] and between the MVIC of handgrip and of the back muscles was r = 0.72, 95% CI [0.51;0.88]. The regression model presented the highest value of R2 being observed when MVIC of the back muscles was tested with five independent variables (63%). In this model handgrip strength was the only predictive variable (ß = 0.61, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The prevalence of CLBP in individuals with LES was 26%. The MVIC of the back muscles was 63% predicted by five variables of interest, however, only the handgrip strength was a statistically significant predictive variable. The MVIC of the back muscles presented a linear relation directly proportional to handgrip and inversely proportional to Oswestry Index i.e. stronger back muscles are associated with lower disability scores.

系统性红斑狼疮患者慢性下腰痛:躯干伸展肌力的患病率和预测因素及其与残疾的相关性
目的了解系统性红斑狼疮(LES)患者慢性腰痛(CLBP)的患病率及背部肌肉力量(BMS)的预测因素。MethodsCross截面研究。采用非概率抽样的方法,选取96例LES门诊患者,在会诊期间进行访谈和测试。结果测量:CLBP点患病率、Oswestry残疾指数、坦帕运动恐惧症量表、疲劳严重程度量表和手部和背部肌肉最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)。采用相关系数和多元线性回归进行统计分析。结果在96名受访个体中,25人患有CLBP,表明点患病率为26%(92%为女性)。Oswestry指数与背部肌肉最大自主静力收缩之间的相关性为r =‐0.4,95% CI[‐0.68;‐0.01],握力与背部肌肉的MVIC之间的相关性为r = 0.72, 95% CI[0.51;0.88]。回归模型显示,当使用5个自变量测试背部肌肉MVIC时,R2值最高(63%)。在该模型中,握力是唯一的预测变量(ß = 0.61, P = 0.001)。结论LES患者CLBP患病率为26%。背部肌肉的MVIC被五个变量预测为63%,然而,只有握力是统计上显著的预测变量。背部肌肉MVIC与握力成正比,与Oswestry指数成反比,即背部肌肉越强壮,残疾评分越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.82
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信