Franz Rosenzweig’s Concept of Redemption as a Vehicle for Confronting the Philosophical Problem of Contemporary Transhumanism

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naharaim Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1515/naha-2021-0013
Joseph (Yossi) Turner, Nadav Shifman Berman
{"title":"Franz Rosenzweig’s Concept of Redemption as a Vehicle for Confronting the Philosophical Problem of Contemporary Transhumanism","authors":"Joseph (Yossi) Turner, Nadav Shifman Berman","doi":"10.1515/naha-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents Franz Rosenzweig’s concept of redemption as a vehicle for raising some important questions for confronting the contemporary movement of Transhumanism. The upshot of our discussion is located in the existential questions asked, following a philosophical comparison of Rosenzweig’s religious and philosophical commitment to human life in its most robust form, with Transhumanism’s scientistic vision. To do so, the article first discusses some techno-scientistic assumptions of Transhumanism, showing that it presumes what was once a core principle of German Idealism, the identity of reason and being, against which Rosenzweig rebelled. Then, the article turns to examine Rosenzweig’s humanistic redemptive vision and its emphasis on the corporeal, the temporal, and the worldly (rather than the purely spiritual, the apocalyptic, and the other-worldly). The conclusion makes explicit the ways in which Rosenzweig’s redemptive vision provides a contrasting model to the one set forth by Transhumanism.","PeriodicalId":40309,"journal":{"name":"Naharaim","volume":"16 1","pages":"29 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naharaim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/naha-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article presents Franz Rosenzweig’s concept of redemption as a vehicle for raising some important questions for confronting the contemporary movement of Transhumanism. The upshot of our discussion is located in the existential questions asked, following a philosophical comparison of Rosenzweig’s religious and philosophical commitment to human life in its most robust form, with Transhumanism’s scientistic vision. To do so, the article first discusses some techno-scientistic assumptions of Transhumanism, showing that it presumes what was once a core principle of German Idealism, the identity of reason and being, against which Rosenzweig rebelled. Then, the article turns to examine Rosenzweig’s humanistic redemptive vision and its emphasis on the corporeal, the temporal, and the worldly (rather than the purely spiritual, the apocalyptic, and the other-worldly). The conclusion makes explicit the ways in which Rosenzweig’s redemptive vision provides a contrasting model to the one set forth by Transhumanism.
弗朗茨·罗森茨威格的救赎概念:面对当代超人类主义哲学问题的工具
摘要本文以Franz Rosenzweig的救赎观为载体,提出了应对当代跨人文主义运动的一些重要问题。我们讨论的结果是在对罗森茨威格以最有力的形式对人类生活的宗教和哲学承诺与跨人文主义的科学主义愿景进行哲学比较之后,提出了存在主义问题。为此,本文首先讨论了跨人本主义的一些技术科学主义假设,表明它假设了曾经是德国唯心主义核心原则的理性与存在的同一性,而罗森茨威格反对这一原则。然后,本文转而考察罗森茨威格的人本主义救赎愿景,以及它对物质、时间和世俗(而不是纯粹的精神、启示和其他世俗)的强调。这一结论明确了罗森茨威格的救赎观与跨人文主义的救赎观是如何形成对比的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Naharaim
Naharaim HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书