Bio-Filtration Technologies for Filtering Ammonia in Fish Tank Effluent for Reuse—A Review

Lawrence Grism Obeti, J. Wanyama, N. Banadda, A. Candia, Samuel George Onep, Ronald Walozi, Andrew Ebic
{"title":"Bio-Filtration Technologies for Filtering Ammonia in Fish Tank Effluent for Reuse—A Review","authors":"Lawrence Grism Obeti, J. Wanyama, N. Banadda, A. Candia, Samuel George Onep, Ronald Walozi, Andrew Ebic","doi":"10.17265/2162-5263/2019.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peri-urban fish farms with limited access to open natural water bodies draw fresh water from urban water supply and dug wells, which is unreliable and costly. Reuse of fish pond effluent is also limited by high ammonia concentration (> 0.3 mg/L) that renders water toxic and is stressful to fish. Despite the existence of several fish effluent treatment methods, not all may be appropriate for a particular location. This review article therefore examines the various fish effluent treatment methods to aid selection of the most suitable one(s) for peri-urban areas. The key parameters considered in their comparison were: initial, operational and maintenance costs; ammonia removal efficiency; energy consumption and land requirement. The effluent treatment methods are both conventional and non-conventional. Despite a slight higher treatment efficiency and less space requirement by conventional methods, they mainly require reliable power supply for continuous running, highly skilled labor for operation and maintenance leading to high operational costs. In addition, their investment costs are higher than non-conventional methods, hence not widely applied in developing countries and majority have broken down. On the other hand, non-conventional methods such as constructed wetlands are widely in use for treating effluent mainly due to their cost effectiveness and no or little energy requirement. Constructed wetlands were found most suitable bio-filtration system for treating fish effluent because they are cost effective, require less skilled labor and still have better effluent treatment though space required is slightly more. Vegetables (lettuce, collards, etc.) have potential to grow in constructed wetlands thus form vegetable-based bio-filtration units which serve not only as bio-filters but also provide additional sources of nutrition and income. This review indicated limited information on the appropriate size and performance of vegetable-based bio-filtration unit utilizing indigenous vegetables and recommended further research to explore the idea.","PeriodicalId":58493,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与工程:B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与工程:B","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2162-5263/2019.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Peri-urban fish farms with limited access to open natural water bodies draw fresh water from urban water supply and dug wells, which is unreliable and costly. Reuse of fish pond effluent is also limited by high ammonia concentration (> 0.3 mg/L) that renders water toxic and is stressful to fish. Despite the existence of several fish effluent treatment methods, not all may be appropriate for a particular location. This review article therefore examines the various fish effluent treatment methods to aid selection of the most suitable one(s) for peri-urban areas. The key parameters considered in their comparison were: initial, operational and maintenance costs; ammonia removal efficiency; energy consumption and land requirement. The effluent treatment methods are both conventional and non-conventional. Despite a slight higher treatment efficiency and less space requirement by conventional methods, they mainly require reliable power supply for continuous running, highly skilled labor for operation and maintenance leading to high operational costs. In addition, their investment costs are higher than non-conventional methods, hence not widely applied in developing countries and majority have broken down. On the other hand, non-conventional methods such as constructed wetlands are widely in use for treating effluent mainly due to their cost effectiveness and no or little energy requirement. Constructed wetlands were found most suitable bio-filtration system for treating fish effluent because they are cost effective, require less skilled labor and still have better effluent treatment though space required is slightly more. Vegetables (lettuce, collards, etc.) have potential to grow in constructed wetlands thus form vegetable-based bio-filtration units which serve not only as bio-filters but also provide additional sources of nutrition and income. This review indicated limited information on the appropriate size and performance of vegetable-based bio-filtration unit utilizing indigenous vegetables and recommended further research to explore the idea.
生物过滤技术处理鱼缸出水氨的研究进展
城市周围的养鱼场只能有限地利用开放的自然水体,从城市供水和挖井中抽取淡水,这既不可靠又昂贵。鱼塘废水的再利用也受到高氨浓度(>0.3 mg/L)的限制,这会使水有毒,并对鱼类造成压力。尽管存在几种鱼类污水处理方法,但并非所有方法都适用于特定地点。因此,这篇综述文章考察了各种鱼类污水处理方法,以帮助选择最适合城市周边地区的方法。在比较中考虑的关键参数是:初始、运营和维护成本;氨去除效率;能源消耗和土地需求。污水处理方法既有传统的也有非传统的。尽管传统方法的处理效率略高,空间要求较小,但它们主要需要可靠的电源来连续运行,需要高技能的操作和维护劳动力,这导致了高的操作成本。此外,它们的投资成本高于非传统方法,因此在发展中国家没有得到广泛应用,大多数方法都已失效。另一方面,人工湿地等非传统方法被广泛用于处理污水,主要是因为它们具有成本效益,并且不需要或很少需要能源。人工湿地被认为是处理鱼类废水最合适的生物过滤系统,因为它们具有成本效益,所需劳动力较少,并且尽管所需空间略大,但仍能更好地处理废水。蔬菜(生菜、羽衣甘蓝等)有可能在人工湿地中生长,从而形成以蔬菜为基础的生物过滤装置,不仅可以用作生物过滤器,还可以提供额外的营养和收入来源。这篇综述指出,关于利用本土蔬菜的蔬菜生物过滤装置的适当尺寸和性能的信息有限,并建议进一步研究以探索这一想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
575
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信