The Substantive Entity and Conceptual Ontology of the Object of Social Science Research and the Future of Anthropology

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Cai Hua
{"title":"The Substantive Entity and Conceptual Ontology of the Object of Social Science Research and the Future of Anthropology","authors":"Cai Hua","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this dialogue, Cai Hua and Maurice Godelier ask whether there has been a change in the research entity. This question concerns the representation of the “world of the other” and its impact on the intellectual world since the advent of postmodernism. Cai Hua states that when he was an overseas student in France in the 1980s, he could not see any traces of colonization. The postmodern movement is simply a kind of emotional catharsis and cannot be called “scientific research” in a rigorous sense. As a scientist, if your position is neutral, you cannot see the other in a dichotomous way; the other is simply what you research, and you are not part of the other.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国社会科学","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this dialogue, Cai Hua and Maurice Godelier ask whether there has been a change in the research entity. This question concerns the representation of the “world of the other” and its impact on the intellectual world since the advent of postmodernism. Cai Hua states that when he was an overseas student in France in the 1980s, he could not see any traces of colonization. The postmodern movement is simply a kind of emotional catharsis and cannot be called “scientific research” in a rigorous sense. As a scientist, if your position is neutral, you cannot see the other in a dichotomous way; the other is simply what you research, and you are not part of the other.
社会科学研究对象的实体、概念本体论与人类学的未来
在这段对话中,蔡华和Maurice Godelier询问研究实体是否发生了变化。这个问题涉及到后现代主义以来“他者世界”的再现及其对知识界的影响。蔡华说,上世纪80年代他在法国留学时,看不到任何殖民的痕迹。后现代运动只是一种情感的宣泄,不能称之为严格意义上的“科学研究”。作为一名科学家,如果你的立场是中立的,你就不能以二分法看待他人;另一个只是你研究的东西,你不是另一个的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国社会科学
中国社会科学 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5101
期刊介绍: Social Sciences in China Press (SSCP) was established in 1979, directly under the administration of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). Currently, SSCP publishes seven journals, one academic newspaper and an English epaper .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信