Evaluating QualiCO: an ontology to facilitate qualitative methods sharing to support open science

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Julian Hocker, Taryn Bipat, David W. Mcdonald, M. Zachry
{"title":"Evaluating QualiCO: an ontology to facilitate qualitative methods sharing to support open science","authors":"Julian Hocker, Taryn Bipat, David W. Mcdonald, M. Zachry","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-148261/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative science methods have largely been omitted from discussions of open science. Platforms focused on qualitative science that support open science data and method sharing are rare. Sharing and exchanging coding schemas has great potential for supporting traceability in qualitative research as well as for facilitating the reuse of coding schemas. In this study, we present and evaluate QualiCO, an ontology to describe qualitative coding schemas. Twenty qualitative researchers used QualiCO to complete two coding tasks. In our findings, we present task performance and interview data that focus participants’ attention on the ontology. Participants used QualiCO to complete the coding tasks, decreasing time on task, while improving accuracy, signifying that QualiCO enabled the reuse of qualitative coding schemas. Our discussion elaborates some issues that participants had and highlights how conceptual and prior practice frames their interpretation of how QualiCO can be used.","PeriodicalId":46467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internet Services and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internet Services and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-148261/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative science methods have largely been omitted from discussions of open science. Platforms focused on qualitative science that support open science data and method sharing are rare. Sharing and exchanging coding schemas has great potential for supporting traceability in qualitative research as well as for facilitating the reuse of coding schemas. In this study, we present and evaluate QualiCO, an ontology to describe qualitative coding schemas. Twenty qualitative researchers used QualiCO to complete two coding tasks. In our findings, we present task performance and interview data that focus participants’ attention on the ontology. Participants used QualiCO to complete the coding tasks, decreasing time on task, while improving accuracy, signifying that QualiCO enabled the reuse of qualitative coding schemas. Our discussion elaborates some issues that participants had and highlights how conceptual and prior practice frames their interpretation of how QualiCO can be used.
评估QualiCO:促进定性方法共享以支持开放科学的本体
关于开放科学的讨论在很大程度上忽略了定性科学方法。支持开放科学数据和方法共享的专注于定性科学的平台很少。共享和交换编码模式对于支持定性研究中的可追溯性以及促进编码模式的重用具有很大的潜力。在这项研究中,我们提出并评估了QualiCO,一个描述定性编码模式的本体。20名定性研究人员使用QualiCO完成两项编码任务。在我们的研究结果中,我们提出了任务表现和访谈数据,将参与者的注意力集中在本体上。参与者使用QualiCO来完成编码任务,减少了完成任务的时间,同时提高了准确性,这表明QualiCO可以重用定性编码模式。我们的讨论详细阐述了参与者的一些问题,并强调了概念和先前的实践如何构建他们对如何使用QualiCO的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Internet Services and Applications
Journal of Internet Services and Applications COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信