Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Slime Producing Staphylococcus Spp. Obtained from Blood Samples of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Q4 Medicine
D. Niyazi, I. Micheva, R. Markovska, T. Stoeva
{"title":"Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Slime Producing Staphylococcus Spp. Obtained from Blood Samples of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation","authors":"D. Niyazi, I. Micheva, R. Markovska, T. Stoeva","doi":"10.2478/amb-2022-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim: to investigate the slime production in isolates of Staphylococcus spp., associated with bacteremia in patients after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and to determine the relationship between the slime production and ica genes carriage, as well as the correlation of ica and methicillin resistance. Materials and methods: Between 2019 and 2020, twenty-one clinically significant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were obtained from blood cultures of 17 patients after HSCT. The species identification and the susceptibility to cefoxitin were determined by BD Phoenix M50. Two phenotypic tests (Congo red agar, CRA; Christensen’s method, TT) and PCR for icaA and icaD were used to detect slime production. A PCR method was also used to detect the mecA, mecC genes. Results: In the studied group of 21 isolates (S. epidermidis, n = 12; S. haemolyticus, n = 4; S. hominis, n = 2; S. aureus, n = 3), the phenotypic tests were positive in 13 isolates. Ten isolates (47.6%) were identified as carriers of ica genes (S. epidermidis, n = 9, and S. haemolyticus, n = 1). Five isolates (23.8%) were detected as slime producers by all three methods. The mecA gene was identified in 18 isolates (85.7%). All ica positive isolates were also mecA carriers. Conclusion: A relatively high proportion of the blood isolates of Staphylococcus spp. were slime producers, associ-ated with ica genes. A combination of both phenotypic and genetic methods should be used to detect alternative routes of slime production. The co-expression of ica and mecA is associ-ated with the occurrence of difficult-to-eradicate isolates.","PeriodicalId":35746,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","volume":"49 1","pages":"11 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2022-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim: to investigate the slime production in isolates of Staphylococcus spp., associated with bacteremia in patients after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and to determine the relationship between the slime production and ica genes carriage, as well as the correlation of ica and methicillin resistance. Materials and methods: Between 2019 and 2020, twenty-one clinically significant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were obtained from blood cultures of 17 patients after HSCT. The species identification and the susceptibility to cefoxitin were determined by BD Phoenix M50. Two phenotypic tests (Congo red agar, CRA; Christensen’s method, TT) and PCR for icaA and icaD were used to detect slime production. A PCR method was also used to detect the mecA, mecC genes. Results: In the studied group of 21 isolates (S. epidermidis, n = 12; S. haemolyticus, n = 4; S. hominis, n = 2; S. aureus, n = 3), the phenotypic tests were positive in 13 isolates. Ten isolates (47.6%) were identified as carriers of ica genes (S. epidermidis, n = 9, and S. haemolyticus, n = 1). Five isolates (23.8%) were detected as slime producers by all three methods. The mecA gene was identified in 18 isolates (85.7%). All ica positive isolates were also mecA carriers. Conclusion: A relatively high proportion of the blood isolates of Staphylococcus spp. were slime producers, associ-ated with ica genes. A combination of both phenotypic and genetic methods should be used to detect alternative routes of slime production. The co-expression of ica and mecA is associ-ated with the occurrence of difficult-to-eradicate isolates.
造血干细胞移植患者血标本中产生黏液葡萄球菌Spp.的表型和分子检测
摘要目的:研究造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后并发菌血症的葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus spp.)分离株产生黏液的情况,并确定黏液产生与ica基因携带的关系,以及ica与甲氧西林耐药性的相关性。材料和方法:2019年至2020年间,从17名HSCT患者的血液培养中获得了21株具有临床意义的葡萄球菌。用BD Phoenix M50对头孢西丁进行菌种鉴定和药敏试验。使用两种表型测试(刚果红琼脂,CRA;克里斯滕森法,TT)和icaA和icaD的PCR来检测黏液的产生。还采用PCR方法检测mecA、mecC基因。结果:在21个分离株(表皮葡萄球菌,n=12;溶血性链球菌,n=4;人型链球菌,n=2;金黄色葡萄球菌,n=3)的研究组中,13个分离株的表型检测呈阳性。10个分离株(47.6%)被鉴定为ica基因携带者(表皮葡萄球菌,n=9,溶血性链球菌,n=1)。三种方法共检测到5株(23.8%)黏液产生菌。mecA基因在18个分离株中检出(85.7%),所有ica阳性分离株均为mecA携带者。结论:葡萄球菌血液分离株中有较高比例为黏液产生菌,与ica基因有关。应结合表型和遗传方法来检测黏液产生的替代途径。ica和mecA的共表达与难以根除的分离株的发生有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Bulgarica
Acta Medica Bulgarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: About 30 years ago - in 1973, on the initiative of the Publishing House „Medicine and Physical Culture", namely its former director Mr. Traian Ivanov, the Ministry of Health set up and accepted to subsidize a new medical magazine that was to be published only in the English language and had to reflect the status and the achievements of the Bulgarian medical science. Thus the language barrier was overcome and stable relations were established with the international medical society, large libraries, and university centers. The famous internationally known scientist professor Assen A. Hadjiolov was elected edition-in-chief by the first editorial staff and the magazine was named Acta Medica Bulgarica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信