Cross-cultural management in China: Competencies of Chinese business students

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS

Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research Pub Date : 2018-11-19 DOI:10.15549/JEECAR.V5I2.220

Tobias Cramer

引用次数: 3

Abstract

The ability to deal with cross-cultural differences has grown in importance due to the increasing number of Sino-foreign cooperation and the fact that more and more Chinese companies are investing abroad. The present study examines cultural awareness and cognitive cultural intelligence (cognitive CQ) of Chinese undergraduate students. The results show that Chinese undergraduate business students are moderately well culturally aware and they display average cognitive CQ.

查看原文本刊更多论文

中国的跨文化管理:中国商科学生的能力

由于中外合作的日益增多，以及越来越多的中国公司在国外投资，处理跨文化差异的能力变得越来越重要。本研究考察了中国大学生的文化意识和认知文化智力。研究结果表明，中国商科本科生具有适度的文化意识，他们表现出平均的认知CQ。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

43.80%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR) is a multi-disciplinary journal related to the Eurasia regional economics, finance, management, marketing, international affairs, and other business-related disciplines. By Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the IEECA refers to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, and five post-Soviet Central Asian states: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics. Any paper submitted to the journal must be original, previously unpublished, and currently not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All articles in the printed version of the journal are peer-reviewed. The review process is a double-blind process. Neither the authors nor the reviewers know who wrote or reviewed the article. Per standard practice, only the Editor assigned to handle a paper knows the identity of the authors and the reviewers.