THE PRINCIPLE OF INTEGRITY IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.33397/2619-0559-2019-1-1-250-268

Н.А. Куркова, Кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры, гражданского права, N. Kurkova

{"title":"THE PRINCIPLE OF INTEGRITY IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH","authors":"Н.А. Куркова, Кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры, гражданского права, N. Kurkova","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2019-1-1-250-268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"uncovering the analysis in scientific works, specification of the percentage of originality of the text of scientific work in the system of antiplagiatics, the impact of the originality of the text of scientific work on access to defend (removal from defend). Methods: during the research private-science methods were used – historical legal, formal-logical, statistical, observations and expert assessments. Results: the observance of the principle of conscientiousness in scientific research is con-ditioned solely by the moral qualities and the formed legal conscience of the researcher. A high percentage of the text originality, confirming the absence of unacceptable borrowings in scientific work is not an indicator of the researcher’s conscientiousness, despite the improvement of their detection algorithms, the expansion of search engines and information bases that allow identifying pla-giarism, autoplagiarism, development and emergence of new software products and resources, including the most common www.antiplagiat.ru. Conclusions: the principle of conscientiousness is based on the goodwill of doing actions honestly, without deception, which directly depends on the moral attitude of the researcher, his scientific adviser and scientific consultant.","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2019-1-1-250-268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

uncovering the analysis in scientific works, specification of the percentage of originality of the text of scientific work in the system of antiplagiatics, the impact of the originality of the text of scientific work on access to defend (removal from defend). Methods: during the research private-science methods were used – historical legal, formal-logical, statistical, observations and expert assessments. Results: the observance of the principle of conscientiousness in scientific research is con-ditioned solely by the moral qualities and the formed legal conscience of the researcher. A high percentage of the text originality, confirming the absence of unacceptable borrowings in scientific work is not an indicator of the researcher’s conscientiousness, despite the improvement of their detection algorithms, the expansion of search engines and information bases that allow identifying pla-giarism, autoplagiarism, development and emergence of new software products and resources, including the most common www.antiplagiat.ru. Conclusions: the principle of conscientiousness is based on the goodwill of doing actions honestly, without deception, which directly depends on the moral attitude of the researcher, his scientific adviser and scientific consultant.

查看原文本刊更多论文

科研诚信原则

揭示了科学著作中的分析、反贫困体系中科学著作文本独创性百分比的规定、科学著作文本的独创性对获得辩护（从辩护中删除）的影响。方法：在研究过程中使用了私人科学方法——历史法律、形式逻辑、统计、观察和专家评估。结果：科学研究中自觉原则的遵守完全取决于研究者的道德品质和形成的法律良知。尽管研究人员的检测算法得到了改进，搜索引擎和信息库得到了扩展，可以识别剽窃、自动剽窃、新软件产品和资源的开发和出现，但文本独创性的高比例，证实了科学工作中没有不可接受的借用，并不能表明研究人员的认真程度，包括最常见的www.antiplarat.ru。结论：尽责原则建立在诚实、不欺骗的善意基础上，这直接取决于研究人员、他的科学顾问和科学顾问的道德态度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks