REVISITING JAVANESE ISLAM

Gedong Maulana Kabir
{"title":"REVISITING JAVANESE ISLAM","authors":"Gedong Maulana Kabir","doi":"10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tends to revisiting Javanese Islamic studies. This study began from the European travelers’ period who noted some aspects of society such as the religious life. Those notes show the negative label that is addressed to the Javanese religious practices. These negative labels are often reproduced in Javanese Islam studies to this day. This article argues that the negative labels in Javanese Islamic studies tend to be misrepresentative. These kinds of results cannot be separated from certain paradigms in religious studies. There are two paradigms in the study of religion which are discussed in this article. First, the world religion paradigm. This paradigm, consciously or not, is often used in Javanese Islamic studies. The implication is Javanese religious practices are often portrayed as animist, syncretic, and so on. Second, the indigenous religion paradigm. This article elaborates this paradigm because of its potential in understanding Javanese Islamic religious practice more properly. The basis of this paradigm is intersubjective relation with ethical commitment, responsibility, and reciprocity.","PeriodicalId":29648,"journal":{"name":"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article tends to revisiting Javanese Islamic studies. This study began from the European travelers’ period who noted some aspects of society such as the religious life. Those notes show the negative label that is addressed to the Javanese religious practices. These negative labels are often reproduced in Javanese Islam studies to this day. This article argues that the negative labels in Javanese Islamic studies tend to be misrepresentative. These kinds of results cannot be separated from certain paradigms in religious studies. There are two paradigms in the study of religion which are discussed in this article. First, the world religion paradigm. This paradigm, consciously or not, is often used in Javanese Islamic studies. The implication is Javanese religious practices are often portrayed as animist, syncretic, and so on. Second, the indigenous religion paradigm. This article elaborates this paradigm because of its potential in understanding Javanese Islamic religious practice more properly. The basis of this paradigm is intersubjective relation with ethical commitment, responsibility, and reciprocity.
重温爪哇伊斯兰教
这篇文章倾向于重新审视爪哇的伊斯兰研究。这一研究开始于欧洲旅行者时期,他们关注社会的某些方面,如宗教生活。这些笔记显示了爪哇宗教活动的负面标签。这些负面的标签在爪哇伊斯兰教研究中经常重复出现。本文认为,爪哇伊斯兰研究中的负面标签往往具有误导性。这些结果与宗教研究中的某些范式是分不开的。本文讨论了宗教研究中的两种范式。第一,世界宗教范式。这种范式,有意无意地,经常被用于爪哇伊斯兰教研究。言下之意是爪哇人的宗教活动经常被描绘成万物有灵论、融合等等。第二,本土宗教范式。本文详细阐述了这一范式,因为它有可能更正确地理解爪哇伊斯兰教的宗教实践。这种范式的基础是主体间关系与伦理承诺、责任和互惠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
1 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信