THE EFFECTIVITY OF ADDITION CHEST MOBILIZATION OR PURSED LIP BREATHING IN CONVENTIONAL THERAPY IN COPD PATIENTS

Fidyatul Nazhira, I. Muliarta, Wahyuddin, P. Astawa, A. Sawitri, S. Purnawati
{"title":"THE EFFECTIVITY OF ADDITION CHEST MOBILIZATION OR PURSED LIP BREATHING IN CONVENTIONAL THERAPY IN COPD PATIENTS","authors":"Fidyatul Nazhira, I. Muliarta, Wahyuddin, P. Astawa, A. Sawitri, S. Purnawati","doi":"10.24843/SPJ.2021.V09.I02.P05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:COPD is an accumulation of pulmonary pathologies that causes limited air flow, then breathlessness. Chest mobilization and pursed lip breathing (PLB) are physiotherapy management aimed at reducing pulmonary hyperinflation, thereby increasing FEV1 and improve breathlessness. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the effectiveness of the addition of chest mobilization or PLB in conventional therapy to an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness in COPD patients at Lung Hospital dr. Ario Wirawan Salatiga. Research methods:This study is a true experiment with a pretest and posttest control group design research design. The research subjects numbered 30 people then divided into 3 groups. All groups were given treatment 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Group I received additional chest mobilization intervention, group II received additional PLB intervention and group 3 received hospital intervention (conventional). FEV1 was measured using spirometry and tightness was measured using a modified Borg scale. Results:Based on the results of the Wilcoxon sign rank test there was an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness with p>0.05 in group 1. In group 2 there was also an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness with p> 0.05. In group 3 there was an increase in FEV1 but there was no improve breathlessness. Different test results after the intervention on increasing FEV1 between groups based on the Kruskal-Wallis t-test obtained p> ??0.05. Different test for reduction of tightness after intervention between groups 1 and 2 using the Mann Whitney U test p value > 0.05. So there is no difference in the effect of adding chest mobilization interventions or PLB and conventional therapy. Conclusion:The addition of chest mobilization or PLB to conventional therapy is as good as conventional in increasing FEV 1 and improve breathlessness in COPD patients at Lung Hospital Dr. Ario Wirawan Salatiga. \nKeyword: COPD; Breathlessness; FEV 1; Chest Mobilization; Pursed Lip Breathing","PeriodicalId":30774,"journal":{"name":"Sport and Fitness Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport and Fitness Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/SPJ.2021.V09.I02.P05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:COPD is an accumulation of pulmonary pathologies that causes limited air flow, then breathlessness. Chest mobilization and pursed lip breathing (PLB) are physiotherapy management aimed at reducing pulmonary hyperinflation, thereby increasing FEV1 and improve breathlessness. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the effectiveness of the addition of chest mobilization or PLB in conventional therapy to an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness in COPD patients at Lung Hospital dr. Ario Wirawan Salatiga. Research methods:This study is a true experiment with a pretest and posttest control group design research design. The research subjects numbered 30 people then divided into 3 groups. All groups were given treatment 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Group I received additional chest mobilization intervention, group II received additional PLB intervention and group 3 received hospital intervention (conventional). FEV1 was measured using spirometry and tightness was measured using a modified Borg scale. Results:Based on the results of the Wilcoxon sign rank test there was an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness with p>0.05 in group 1. In group 2 there was also an increase in FEV1 and improve breathlessness with p> 0.05. In group 3 there was an increase in FEV1 but there was no improve breathlessness. Different test results after the intervention on increasing FEV1 between groups based on the Kruskal-Wallis t-test obtained p> ??0.05. Different test for reduction of tightness after intervention between groups 1 and 2 using the Mann Whitney U test p value > 0.05. So there is no difference in the effect of adding chest mobilization interventions or PLB and conventional therapy. Conclusion:The addition of chest mobilization or PLB to conventional therapy is as good as conventional in increasing FEV 1 and improve breathlessness in COPD patients at Lung Hospital Dr. Ario Wirawan Salatiga. Keyword: COPD; Breathlessness; FEV 1; Chest Mobilization; Pursed Lip Breathing
在copd患者的常规治疗中增加胸部活动或闭口呼吸的有效性
背景:慢性阻塞性肺病是一种肺部疾病的累积,会导致气流受限,然后出现呼吸困难。胸部活动和抿唇呼吸(PLB)是一种物理治疗方法,旨在减少肺部过度充气,从而增加FEV1并改善呼吸困难。本研究的目的是确定肺科医院Ario Wirawan Salatiga医生在常规治疗中增加胸部动员或PLB对COPD患者FEV1增加和改善呼吸困难的有效性的差异。研究方法:本研究是一个真实的实验,采用前测和后测对照组设计的研究设计。研究对象30人,然后分成3组。所有组均给予治疗,每周3次,持续6周。第一组接受额外的胸部动员干预,第二组接受额外PLB干预,第三组接受医院干预(常规)。使用肺活量测定法测量FEV1,使用改良Borg量表测量紧密度。结果:根据Wilcoxon征秩检验结果,第1组FEV1增加,呼吸困难改善,p>0.05。在第2组中,FEV1也有所增加,并改善了呼吸困难,p>0.05。在第3组中,FEV1增加,但呼吸困难没有改善。基于Kruskal-Wallis t检验,干预组间FEV1增加后的不同测试结果获得了p>0.05??0.05。干预后第1组和第2组之间使用Mann-Whitney U检验的松紧度降低的不同检验p值>0.05。因此,增加胸部动员干预或PLB与常规治疗的效果没有差异。结论:在肺科医院Ario Wirawan Salatiga医生的COPD患者中,在常规治疗的基础上增加胸部动员或PLB在提高FEV1和改善呼吸困难方面与常规治疗一样好。关键词:慢阻肺;呼吸困难;FEV 1;胸部动员;追求唇式呼吸
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信