Survival of Russian banks: how efficient are the control measures?

IF 4.2 Q2 BUSINESS
Á. Barajas, V. Krakovich, F. López-Iturriaga
{"title":"Survival of Russian banks: how efficient are the control measures?","authors":"Á. Barajas, V. Krakovich, F. López-Iturriaga","doi":"10.1108/ejmbe-12-2021-0329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn this paper, the authors study the failure of Russian banks between 2012 and 2019.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyze the entire population of Russian banks and combine a logit model with the survival analysis.FindingsIn addition to the usual determinants, the authors find that not-failed banks have higher levels of fulfillment of the Central Bank requirements of solvency, liquidity, provide fewer loans to their shareholders and own more shares of other banks. The results of this study suggest an asymmetric effect of the strategic orientation of banks: whereas the proportion of deposits from firms is negatively related to the probability of failure, the loans to firms are positively related to bankruptcies. According to this research, the fact of being controlled by a foreign bank has a significant negative relationship with the likelihood of failure and moderates the effect of bank size, performance and growth on the bankruptcy likelihood.Practical implicationsOn the whole, the results of this study support the new Central Bank rules, but show that the thresholds imposed by the Russian regulator actually do not make a difference between failed and not failed banks in the short and medium term.Originality/valueThe authors specially focus on the effectiveness of new rules issued by the Central Bank of Russia in 2013.","PeriodicalId":45118,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-12-2021-0329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, the authors study the failure of Russian banks between 2012 and 2019.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyze the entire population of Russian banks and combine a logit model with the survival analysis.FindingsIn addition to the usual determinants, the authors find that not-failed banks have higher levels of fulfillment of the Central Bank requirements of solvency, liquidity, provide fewer loans to their shareholders and own more shares of other banks. The results of this study suggest an asymmetric effect of the strategic orientation of banks: whereas the proportion of deposits from firms is negatively related to the probability of failure, the loans to firms are positively related to bankruptcies. According to this research, the fact of being controlled by a foreign bank has a significant negative relationship with the likelihood of failure and moderates the effect of bank size, performance and growth on the bankruptcy likelihood.Practical implicationsOn the whole, the results of this study support the new Central Bank rules, but show that the thresholds imposed by the Russian regulator actually do not make a difference between failed and not failed banks in the short and medium term.Originality/valueThe authors specially focus on the effectiveness of new rules issued by the Central Bank of Russia in 2013.
俄罗斯银行的生存:控制措施的效率如何?
本文以2012 - 2019年俄罗斯银行的倒闭为研究对象。设计/方法/方法作者分析了俄罗斯银行的全部人口,并将logit模型与生存分析相结合。除了通常的决定因素外,作者还发现,没有破产的银行在满足央行对偿付能力、流动性的要求方面水平更高,向股东提供的贷款更少,持有其他银行的股份更多。本研究的结果表明了银行战略取向的不对称效应:尽管企业存款比例与破产概率负相关,但企业贷款比例与破产概率正相关。本研究发现,被外资银行控制的事实与破产可能性呈显著负相关,并调节银行规模、业绩和成长性对破产可能性的影响。总体而言,本研究的结果支持新的中央银行规则,但表明俄罗斯监管机构施加的门槛实际上在短期和中期对失败和未失败的银行没有区别。作者特别关注了2013年俄罗斯中央银行发布的新规则的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Management and Business Economics is interested in the publication and diffusion of articles of rigorous theoretical, methodological or empirical research associated with the areas of business economics, including strategy, finance, management, marketing, organisation, human resources, operations, and corporate governance, and tourism. The journal aims to attract original knowledge based on academic rigour and of relevance for academics, researchers, professionals, and/or public decision-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信