Perbandingan Tingkat Penyembuhan Tulang Antara Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture, Both Tibial dan Fibula Diaphyseal Fracture Setelah Terapi Interlocking Intramedullary Solid Nail

MedULA Pub Date : 2019-01-08 DOI:10.46496/MEDULA.V6I1.5373
Muhammad Rustam Hn, Nina Indriyani
{"title":"Perbandingan Tingkat Penyembuhan Tulang Antara Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture, Both Tibial dan Fibula Diaphyseal Fracture Setelah Terapi Interlocking Intramedullary Solid Nail","authors":"Muhammad Rustam Hn, Nina Indriyani","doi":"10.46496/MEDULA.V6I1.5373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOne of the fixation method is interlocking intramedullary solid nail that can enhance the callus formation in tibial diaphyseal fracture through the secondary healing. The research aimed to compare the rate of bone healing between isolated tibial diaphyseal fracture and both diaphyseal tibial and fibular fracture after therapy solid interlocking intramedullary nail. This research was conducted by comparing the results of the cure rate among patients with isolated fractures of the tibia and fracture of the tibia with fractures of the fibula during November 2007 to December 2015. The first group, comprising 29 patients and the second group comprised 47 patients. All patients had solid action intramedullary nail. The evaluation was done 30 weeks post-surgery, to assess the Union Rate using Radiographic Union Score for tibial Fractures (RUST). Data were analyzed using non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney test for comparing the union rate between the two groups. The results showed that 27 of 29 patients with isolated tibial fractures had RUST score > 7 and 2 patients with RUST score < 7. Meanwhile, 44 patients out of 47 patients with both diaphyseal tibial and fibular fracture, having RUST score > 7 and 3 patients with a score < 7. Keywords: Interlocking intramedullary solid nail, Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture Radiographic Union Score, Unionrate","PeriodicalId":40595,"journal":{"name":"MedULA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedULA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46496/MEDULA.V6I1.5373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTOne of the fixation method is interlocking intramedullary solid nail that can enhance the callus formation in tibial diaphyseal fracture through the secondary healing. The research aimed to compare the rate of bone healing between isolated tibial diaphyseal fracture and both diaphyseal tibial and fibular fracture after therapy solid interlocking intramedullary nail. This research was conducted by comparing the results of the cure rate among patients with isolated fractures of the tibia and fracture of the tibia with fractures of the fibula during November 2007 to December 2015. The first group, comprising 29 patients and the second group comprised 47 patients. All patients had solid action intramedullary nail. The evaluation was done 30 weeks post-surgery, to assess the Union Rate using Radiographic Union Score for tibial Fractures (RUST). Data were analyzed using non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney test for comparing the union rate between the two groups. The results showed that 27 of 29 patients with isolated tibial fractures had RUST score > 7 and 2 patients with RUST score < 7. Meanwhile, 44 patients out of 47 patients with both diaphyseal tibial and fibular fracture, having RUST score > 7 and 3 patients with a score < 7. Keywords: Interlocking intramedullary solid nail, Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture Radiographic Union Score, Unionrate
交锁髓内固定钉治疗孤立性胫骨及腓骨骨折后骨生长水平的比较
摘要交锁髓内实钉是胫骨骨干骨折的一种固定方法,可通过继发愈合促进骨痂的形成。本研究旨在比较单纯胫骨骨干骨折与胫腓骨骨干骨折在实心交锁髓内钉治疗后的骨愈合率。本研究比较2007年11月至2015年12月间,单纯胫骨骨折与胫骨骨折合并腓骨骨折患者的治愈率。第一组29例,第二组47例。所有患者均有实心髓内钉。手术后30周进行评估,使用胫骨骨折放射愈合评分(RUST)评估愈合率。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney检验的非参数检验比较两组合并率。结果29例孤立性胫骨骨折患者中27例RUST评分为bb70分,2例RUST评分< 7分。同时,47例胫腓骨骨干骨折患者中有44例RUST评分为bb70分,3例评分< 7分。关键词:交锁髓内实钉;孤立性胫骨骨干骨折x线片愈合评分;愈合率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MedULA
MedULA MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信