Sanctuary Corporations: Should Liberal Corporations Get Religion?

Elizabeth Brown, Inara K. Scott
{"title":"Sanctuary Corporations: Should Liberal Corporations Get Religion?","authors":"Elizabeth Brown, Inara K. Scott","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3033929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spurred on by the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation policies and open hostility to immigrants, the “sanctuary” movement has seen rapid growth across a variety of sectors. With a clear religious foundation, churches, synagogues, and individuals associated with the sanctuary movement have pledged to offer housing, support, and assistance to vulnerable individuals at risk for deportation. Some businesses have publicly expressed their support for undocumented people; we now see sanctuary restaurants, sanctuary homes (for domestic workers), and sanctuary unions. But what happens if these businesses run afoul of immigration laws? Can they claim religious freedom as a defense for their actions? Following the logic of Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, we argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) could provide a shield for businesses, provided they act out of a sincere religious belief. Given this conclusion, we discuss the expanded role religion has begun to play in business today, and how this may ultimately be a dangerous result for civil society.","PeriodicalId":90761,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","volume":"20 1","pages":"1101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.3033929","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3033929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Spurred on by the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation policies and open hostility to immigrants, the “sanctuary” movement has seen rapid growth across a variety of sectors. With a clear religious foundation, churches, synagogues, and individuals associated with the sanctuary movement have pledged to offer housing, support, and assistance to vulnerable individuals at risk for deportation. Some businesses have publicly expressed their support for undocumented people; we now see sanctuary restaurants, sanctuary homes (for domestic workers), and sanctuary unions. But what happens if these businesses run afoul of immigration laws? Can they claim religious freedom as a defense for their actions? Following the logic of Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, we argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) could provide a shield for businesses, provided they act out of a sincere religious belief. Given this conclusion, we discuss the expanded role religion has begun to play in business today, and how this may ultimately be a dangerous result for civil society.
庇护公司:自由主义公司应该得到信仰吗?
在特朗普政府激进的驱逐政策和对移民的公开敌意的推动下,“庇护”运动在各个领域都迅速发展。有了明确的宗教基础,教堂、犹太教堂和与庇护运动有关的个人承诺为有被驱逐风险的弱势群体提供住房、支持和援助。一些企业公开表示支持无证人员;我们现在看到了避难所餐厅、避难所之家(为家庭佣工)和避难所工会。但是,如果这些企业违反了移民法,会发生什么呢?他们能以宗教自由为自己的行为辩护吗?根据Hobby Lobby诉Burwell一案的逻辑,我们认为《宗教自由恢复法》可以为企业提供保护,前提是企业出于真诚的宗教信仰行事。鉴于这一结论,我们讨论了宗教在当今商业中开始发挥的扩大作用,以及这对公民社会来说最终可能是一个危险的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信