How to Explain Major Policy Change Towards Sustainability? Bringing Together the Multiple Streams Framework and the Multilevel Perspective on Socio‐Technical Transitions to Explore the German “Energiewende”

IF 4.1 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Pim Derwort, Nicolas W. Jager, J. Newig
{"title":"How to Explain Major Policy Change Towards Sustainability? Bringing Together the Multiple Streams Framework and the Multilevel Perspective on Socio‐Technical Transitions to Explore the German “Energiewende”","authors":"Pim Derwort, Nicolas W. Jager, J. Newig","doi":"10.1111/PSJ.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most efforts at explaining major policy transformation apply a single lens to study specific cases. Recent contributions have called for a more plural use of theories to facilitate the production of valuable new perspectives and research agendas. The German energy transition is a good example of such a transformative change. This article takes up the call for cross- fertilization of theories, using two complementary lenses to explain the German energy transition: (i) applying the multiple streams framework (MSF) demonstrates how political factors and public opinion have opened a “policy window” for reform from a political dimension. (ii) The multilevel perspective on sustainability transitions (MLP) sheds more light on the importance technological innovation for transformation processes. Exemplified through the German energy transition, we highlight limitations of both lenses, as well as the value of using multiple lenses to analyze specific cases of major policy change. The MSF highlights the role of agency and power relations. The MLP demonstrates how niche- technologies uproot the incumbent regime. Employing both lenses together offers insights as to how major policy change goes beyond single instances of decision- making but is the product of a larger trajectory of path-dependence that emerges from the interplay of socio- technical and political dynamics.","PeriodicalId":48154,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PSJ.12428","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PSJ.12428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Most efforts at explaining major policy transformation apply a single lens to study specific cases. Recent contributions have called for a more plural use of theories to facilitate the production of valuable new perspectives and research agendas. The German energy transition is a good example of such a transformative change. This article takes up the call for cross- fertilization of theories, using two complementary lenses to explain the German energy transition: (i) applying the multiple streams framework (MSF) demonstrates how political factors and public opinion have opened a “policy window” for reform from a political dimension. (ii) The multilevel perspective on sustainability transitions (MLP) sheds more light on the importance technological innovation for transformation processes. Exemplified through the German energy transition, we highlight limitations of both lenses, as well as the value of using multiple lenses to analyze specific cases of major policy change. The MSF highlights the role of agency and power relations. The MLP demonstrates how niche- technologies uproot the incumbent regime. Employing both lenses together offers insights as to how major policy change goes beyond single instances of decision- making but is the product of a larger trajectory of path-dependence that emerges from the interplay of socio- technical and political dynamics.
如何解释朝向可持续发展的重大政策转变?结合多流框架和社会技术转型的多层次视角探讨德国的“能源转型”
大多数解释重大政策转变的努力都是从单一的角度来研究具体案例。最近的贡献呼吁更多地使用理论,以促进产生有价值的新观点和研究议程。德国的能源转型就是这种变革的一个很好的例子。本文呼吁理论交叉融合,使用两个互补的视角来解释德国的能源转型:(i)应用多流框架(MSF)从政治维度展示了政治因素和公众舆论如何为改革打开“政策窗口”。(ii)可持续性转型的多层次视角进一步阐明了技术创新对转型过程的重要性。以德国能源转型为例,我们强调了两种视角的局限性,以及使用多个视角分析重大政策变化的具体案例的价值。无国界医生强调了机构和权力关系的作用。MLP展示了利基技术是如何铲除现有政权的。将这两个视角结合起来,可以深入了解重大政策变化如何超越单一的决策实例,而是社会技术和政治动态相互作用产生的更大路径依赖轨迹的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: As the principal outlet for the Public Policy Section of the American Political Science Association and for the Policy Studies Organization (PSO), the Policy Studies Journal (PSJ) is the premier channel for the publication of public policy research. PSJ is best characterized as an outlet for theoretically and empirically grounded research on policy process and policy analysis. More specifically, we aim to publish articles that advance public policy theory, explicitly articulate its methods of data collection and analysis, and provide clear descriptions of how their work advances the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信