Antecedents of Empathic Capacity: Emotion Regulation Styles as Mediators between Controlling Versus Autonomy - Supportive Maternal Practices and Empathy

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
M. Kalman-Halevi, Yaniv Kanat‐Maymon, G. Roth
{"title":"Antecedents of Empathic Capacity: Emotion Regulation Styles as Mediators between Controlling Versus Autonomy - Supportive Maternal Practices and Empathy","authors":"M. Kalman-Halevi, Yaniv Kanat‐Maymon, G. Roth","doi":"10.56300/ykol5279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research suggests that empathy may lead to either sympathy, involving emotional identification with another person, accompanied by caring and concern, or personal distress, that is emotional reaction to another's condition that is aversive and self-centered (Eisenberg et al., 2010). While the former frequently predicts prosocial behavior, the latter is hypothesized to predict it only when helping is the easiest way to alleviate the distress of the helper (Batson, 1991). Drawing on self-determination theory, we hypothesized that autonomy supportive parenting (taking the child’s perspective and providing choice) may predict the child’s integrative emotion regulation, and this may predict emotional identification with others in need (i.e., sympathy). In contrast, the autonomy suppressive practice of conditional regard may predict dysregulation of emotions, leading to personal distress when facing a close friend’s adversity. Participants included 147 college students and 147 close friends. Target participants reported perceptions of their mothers’ behaviour and their own emotion regulation styles, while close friends reported perceptions of target participants’ sympathy and personal distress responses. Results support the study’s hypotheses and provide insights into the socialization of emotion regulation and empathy. Keywords: parental conditional regard, autonomy support, emotion regulation, empathetic capacity","PeriodicalId":44209,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emotional Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emotional Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56300/ykol5279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that empathy may lead to either sympathy, involving emotional identification with another person, accompanied by caring and concern, or personal distress, that is emotional reaction to another's condition that is aversive and self-centered (Eisenberg et al., 2010). While the former frequently predicts prosocial behavior, the latter is hypothesized to predict it only when helping is the easiest way to alleviate the distress of the helper (Batson, 1991). Drawing on self-determination theory, we hypothesized that autonomy supportive parenting (taking the child’s perspective and providing choice) may predict the child’s integrative emotion regulation, and this may predict emotional identification with others in need (i.e., sympathy). In contrast, the autonomy suppressive practice of conditional regard may predict dysregulation of emotions, leading to personal distress when facing a close friend’s adversity. Participants included 147 college students and 147 close friends. Target participants reported perceptions of their mothers’ behaviour and their own emotion regulation styles, while close friends reported perceptions of target participants’ sympathy and personal distress responses. Results support the study’s hypotheses and provide insights into the socialization of emotion regulation and empathy. Keywords: parental conditional regard, autonomy support, emotion regulation, empathetic capacity
移情能力的前提:情绪调节方式作为控制与自主的中介——支持性母亲行为与移情
研究表明,共情可能导致同情,包括对另一个人的情感认同,伴随着关心和关心,或者个人痛苦,这是对另一个人的情况的情绪反应,是厌恶和以自我为中心的(Eisenberg et al., 2010)。虽然前者经常预测亲社会行为,但后者只有在帮助是减轻帮助者痛苦的最简单方法时才会预测亲社会行为(Batson, 1991)。根据自我决定理论,我们假设自主支持性养育(站在孩子的角度并提供选择)可能预测孩子的综合情绪调节,这可能预测与其他有需要的人的情感认同(即同情)。相比之下,条件关注的自主性抑制实践可能预测情绪失调,导致个人在面对亲密朋友的逆境时感到痛苦。参与者包括147名大学生和147名亲密朋友。目标参与者报告了他们对母亲行为和自己情绪调节风格的看法,而亲密的朋友报告了目标参与者对同情和个人痛苦反应的看法。结果支持了本研究的假设,并为情绪调节和共情的社会化提供了见解。关键词:父母条件关注、自主支持、情绪调节、共情能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal providing space for high quality, empirically based papers on effective intervention and evaluation in the area of emotional education. The journal has special issues dedicated to specific topics in emotional education, and a book review section. Some of the areas related covered by the journal include amongst others emotional intelligence, social and emotional development, educational resilience, social and emotional health, social and emotional literacy, social and emotional competence, social, emotional and behaviour difficulties, health promotion in schools, mental health in children and young people, mental health in schools, behaviour management and behaviour modification, teaching and learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信