Scaling Rural Access: One Foundation’s Partnership to Expand FAFSA Completion Across Mississippi

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
B. Kellogg, A. Hendrick, Kierstan Dufour, P. Steele
{"title":"Scaling Rural Access: One Foundation’s Partnership to Expand FAFSA Completion Across Mississippi","authors":"B. Kellogg, A. Hendrick, Kierstan Dufour, P. Steele","doi":"10.9707/1944-5660.1527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In rural states, under-resourced groups are sometimes left behind when quantitative scaling strategies involve a more cost-effective focus on areas with a concentrated population. This article discusses Get2College, a model by the Woodward Hines Education Foundation to provide financial aid counseling to Mississippi high school students, and a study that assessed efforts to increase the number of students who complete the FAFSA. Get2College’s approach to scaling involved a partnership with the state’s rurally based community colleges and leveraged their established support networks to expand its outreach to the state’s often underserved students and raise FAFSA completion rates among that population. As foundations seek to support nonprofits with scaling their initiatives, a key question to consider when choosing an approach should always be: Who might be excluded? i In the quest for equitable and lasting reform in postsecondary education, philanthropy’s great strength is its flexibility to make use of multiple strategies. However, as most grantmakers know firsthand, not all strategy combinations lead to lasting systemic change. This article offers an actionable approach for designing and analyzing philanthropically funded movements in order to remake an area of educational policy or practice. It introduces a tool, rooted in organizational research, to understand and predict the circumstances under which different combinations of strategies are likely to lead to lasting change. The tool is applied to two real-world examples, the movements for degree reclamation and community college data capacity, with particular attention to deepening funders’ analytic and strategic attention to dismantling educational inequities. Philanthropy has a significant role to play in public policy advocacy, both in involving the individuals they support in advocacy and ensuring that advocates have the tools to be successful — not only in funding, but also in robust capacity-building assistance. Looking at the work of the National College Attainment Network, this article explores how philanthropic investments can impact advocacy, in both financial and capacity-building support, through a recounting of a recent advocacy grantmaking initiative. It also details the key conditions conducive to policy change and the supports that were provided to grantees during the funding period. Included is a specific issue-area case study on the impact of the collective grantee cohort. Education Foundation designed to test a strategy for increasing college enrollment among Mississippi students through greater college exploration opportunities and application and financial aid supports. Four major lessons include: Begin with a commitment to engagement between school districts and school administrators; create a “college team” at each school to embed support for enrollment and completion; build a strong theory of change and evaluation method; and customize support strategies to regional contexts and individual schools. A hands-off, donor-driven approach in general has been common among community foundations; for scholarships, this results in programs that tend to focus on rewarding merit or fund students who might otherwise still have access to college. The Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation’s new approach presented donors with other options including one designed to address disparities in degree attainment and focused on impact. The new Community Scholarship Program provides multi-year scholarships to students who are first generation, from low-income families, and youth of color, pairing each with a College Success Coach. This article outlines the program and concludes with recommendations for other community foundations interested in addressing disparities in access to college and degree attainment. and emphasizes the importance of visiting rural communities in person. The article suggests several ways funders can deepen their engagement with the rural communities they serve.","PeriodicalId":42766,"journal":{"name":"Foundation Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In rural states, under-resourced groups are sometimes left behind when quantitative scaling strategies involve a more cost-effective focus on areas with a concentrated population. This article discusses Get2College, a model by the Woodward Hines Education Foundation to provide financial aid counseling to Mississippi high school students, and a study that assessed efforts to increase the number of students who complete the FAFSA. Get2College’s approach to scaling involved a partnership with the state’s rurally based community colleges and leveraged their established support networks to expand its outreach to the state’s often underserved students and raise FAFSA completion rates among that population. As foundations seek to support nonprofits with scaling their initiatives, a key question to consider when choosing an approach should always be: Who might be excluded? i In the quest for equitable and lasting reform in postsecondary education, philanthropy’s great strength is its flexibility to make use of multiple strategies. However, as most grantmakers know firsthand, not all strategy combinations lead to lasting systemic change. This article offers an actionable approach for designing and analyzing philanthropically funded movements in order to remake an area of educational policy or practice. It introduces a tool, rooted in organizational research, to understand and predict the circumstances under which different combinations of strategies are likely to lead to lasting change. The tool is applied to two real-world examples, the movements for degree reclamation and community college data capacity, with particular attention to deepening funders’ analytic and strategic attention to dismantling educational inequities. Philanthropy has a significant role to play in public policy advocacy, both in involving the individuals they support in advocacy and ensuring that advocates have the tools to be successful — not only in funding, but also in robust capacity-building assistance. Looking at the work of the National College Attainment Network, this article explores how philanthropic investments can impact advocacy, in both financial and capacity-building support, through a recounting of a recent advocacy grantmaking initiative. It also details the key conditions conducive to policy change and the supports that were provided to grantees during the funding period. Included is a specific issue-area case study on the impact of the collective grantee cohort. Education Foundation designed to test a strategy for increasing college enrollment among Mississippi students through greater college exploration opportunities and application and financial aid supports. Four major lessons include: Begin with a commitment to engagement between school districts and school administrators; create a “college team” at each school to embed support for enrollment and completion; build a strong theory of change and evaluation method; and customize support strategies to regional contexts and individual schools. A hands-off, donor-driven approach in general has been common among community foundations; for scholarships, this results in programs that tend to focus on rewarding merit or fund students who might otherwise still have access to college. The Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation’s new approach presented donors with other options including one designed to address disparities in degree attainment and focused on impact. The new Community Scholarship Program provides multi-year scholarships to students who are first generation, from low-income families, and youth of color, pairing each with a College Success Coach. This article outlines the program and concludes with recommendations for other community foundations interested in addressing disparities in access to college and degree attainment. and emphasizes the importance of visiting rural communities in person. The article suggests several ways funders can deepen their engagement with the rural communities they serve.
扩大农村准入:一个基金会的合作伙伴关系,以扩大整个密西西比州的FAFSA完成
在农村各州,当量化规模战略涉及以更具成本效益的方式关注人口集中地区时,资源不足的群体有时会被抛在后面。这篇文章讨论了Get2College,一个由Woodward Hines教育基金会为密西西比州高中生提供经济援助咨询的模式,以及一项评估努力增加完成FAFSA的学生数量的研究。Get2College扩大规模的方法包括与该州以农村为基础的社区学院建立伙伴关系,并利用他们建立的支持网络,将其扩展到该州经常得不到充分服务的学生,并提高这些学生的FAFSA完成率。当基金会寻求支持非营利组织扩大项目规模时,在选择方法时要考虑的一个关键问题应该始终是:谁可能被排除在外?在追求公平和持久的高等教育改革的过程中,慈善事业的巨大优势在于它可以灵活地使用多种策略。然而,正如大多数资助者直接了解的那样,并非所有的战略组合都会导致持久的系统性变化。本文为设计和分析慈善资助运动提供了一种可行的方法,以便重塑教育政策或实践领域。它引入了一种植根于组织研究的工具,用于理解和预测在何种情况下,不同的战略组合可能导致持久的变化。该工具应用于两个现实世界的例子,学位回收运动和社区大学数据容量,特别关注加深资助者对消除教育不平等的分析和战略关注。慈善事业在公共政策倡导中可以发挥重要作用,既可以让他们支持的个人参与倡导,也可以确保倡导者拥有成功的工具——不仅在资金方面,而且在强有力的能力建设援助方面。着眼于国家大学成就网络的工作,本文通过对最近的倡导赠款计划的叙述,探讨了慈善投资如何在财务和能力建设支持方面影响倡导。它还详细说明了有利于政策变化的关键条件以及在供资期间向受助人提供的支助。其中包括一个关于集体赠款群体影响的具体问题领域案例研究。教育基金会旨在测试一种策略,通过更多的大学探索机会、申请和经济援助支持,增加密西西比州学生的大学入学率。四个主要的教训包括:从学区和学校管理者之间的承诺开始;在每所学校建立一个“大学团队”,为入学和完成学业提供支持;建立强有力的变革理论和评价方法;并根据地区情况和个别学校定制支持策略。在社区基金会中,不干涉、捐助者驱动的做法普遍存在;就奖学金而言,这导致项目往往侧重于奖励优秀学生或资助那些本来可能仍有机会上大学的学生。安娜堡地区社区基金会的新方法为捐助者提供了其他选择,包括旨在解决学位获得差异并侧重于影响的选择。新的社区奖学金计划为来自低收入家庭的第一代学生和有色人种青年提供多年奖学金,并为每个人提供大学成功教练。本文概述了该计划,并总结了对其他有兴趣解决大学入学和学位获得差距的社区基金会的建议。并强调了亲自访问农村社区的重要性。这篇文章提出了几种资助者可以加深与他们所服务的农村社区接触的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foundation Review
Foundation Review SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Foundation Review is the first peer-reviewed journal of philanthropy, written by and for foundation staff and boards and those who work with them. Each quarterly issue provides peer-reviewed reports about the field of philanthropy, including reports by foundations on their own work. The Foundation Review is a hybrid journal, with a mix of subscriber-only and open-access content. Sponsored issues may be completely open access. Authors may pay to have articles made open access. All articles become open access two years after publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信