Efficacy and Safety of Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer vs ENSEAL in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uterus: A Comparative Study in Mysuru, South India

Q4 Medicine
P. Talwar, Swathi Hassan Kumarachar, Lakshmi Velayudam, Tohreen Fathima
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer vs ENSEAL in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uterus: A Comparative Study in Mysuru, South India","authors":"P. Talwar, Swathi Hassan Kumarachar, Lakshmi Velayudam, Tohreen Fathima","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10033-1431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Context: Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynecological procedure around the world. Hemostasis is of major concern in an enlarged uterus as chances of hemorrhage are more. New laparoscopic vessel sealing devices have been developed for laparoscopic tissue dissection and vessel sealing. In this study, an ALAN vessel sealer, an indigenous electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device, is compared with ENSEAL device with respect to safety, efficacy, and perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy for a large uterus. Aims and objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (ALAN vessel sealer) vs ENSEAL in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for a large uterus. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized case–control study included 100 women who underwent TLH for a large fibroid uterus. Of them, 50 women underwent TLH using ALAN vessel sealer, and the remaining 50 using ENSEAL. Efficacy, safety, and perioperative outcomes of both the groups were compared. Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 16.0 software. For evaluating continuous variables and discrete variables, independent T-tests, and Chi-square tests, respectively, were used. Results: Duration of surgery in ALAN vessel sealer group was 56.90 ± 12.45 minutes and in ENSEAL group was 57.25 ± 13.54 minutes (p = 0.9) and mean blood loss in group A and group B was 111.40 ± 22.32 and 107.84 ± 20.33 mL, respectively ( p = 0.4), both of the data were not statistically significant. No significant differences were noticed in the demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: The ALAN vessel sealer is safe and as efficient as ENSEAL in decreasing blood loss and operative time when laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed for an enlarged uterus. It is cost-effective and a promising instrument for TLH in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10033-1431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ab s t r Ac t Context: Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynecological procedure around the world. Hemostasis is of major concern in an enlarged uterus as chances of hemorrhage are more. New laparoscopic vessel sealing devices have been developed for laparoscopic tissue dissection and vessel sealing. In this study, an ALAN vessel sealer, an indigenous electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device, is compared with ENSEAL device with respect to safety, efficacy, and perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy for a large uterus. Aims and objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (ALAN vessel sealer) vs ENSEAL in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for a large uterus. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized case–control study included 100 women who underwent TLH for a large fibroid uterus. Of them, 50 women underwent TLH using ALAN vessel sealer, and the remaining 50 using ENSEAL. Efficacy, safety, and perioperative outcomes of both the groups were compared. Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 16.0 software. For evaluating continuous variables and discrete variables, independent T-tests, and Chi-square tests, respectively, were used. Results: Duration of surgery in ALAN vessel sealer group was 56.90 ± 12.45 minutes and in ENSEAL group was 57.25 ± 13.54 minutes (p = 0.9) and mean blood loss in group A and group B was 111.40 ± 22.32 and 107.84 ± 20.33 mL, respectively ( p = 0.4), both of the data were not statistically significant. No significant differences were noticed in the demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: The ALAN vessel sealer is safe and as efficient as ENSEAL in decreasing blood loss and operative time when laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed for an enlarged uterus. It is cost-effective and a promising instrument for TLH in developing countries.
电热双极血管封闭器与ENSEAL在大子宫腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的疗效和安全性:印度南部Mysuru的比较研究
背景:子宫切除术是世界上最常见的妇科手术。在子宫肿大出血的可能性更大时,止血是主要关注的问题。新的腹腔镜血管密封装置已开发用于腹腔镜组织解剖和血管密封。在本研究中,我们比较了ALAN血管密封器(一种国产电热双极血管密封装置)与ENSEAL装置在大子宫腹腔镜子宫切除术中的安全性、有效性和围手术期结果。目的和目的:本研究旨在确定电热双极血管封堵器(ALAN血管封堵器)与ENSEAL在大子宫腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)中的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机病例对照研究包括100名因大肌瘤子宫接受TLH的妇女。其中,50名妇女使用ALAN血管密封剂行TLH,其余50名使用ENSEAL。比较两组患者的疗效、安全性及围手术期疗效。统计分析:采用SPSS 16.0软件进行统计分析。对于评价连续变量和离散变量,分别使用独立t检验和卡方检验。结果:ALAN组手术时间56.90±12.45 min, ENSEAL组手术时间57.25±13.54 min (p = 0.9), A、B组平均失血量分别为111.40±22.32、107.84±20.33 mL (p = 0.4),两组数据均无统计学意义。两组在人口学特征、术中及术后并发症方面无显著差异。结论:在腹腔镜子宫切除术中,ALAN血管封堵器在减少出血量和缩短手术时间方面与ENSEAL一样安全有效。它具有成本效益,是发展中国家TLH的一个有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信